The barrage in the live broadcast room has been overwhelmed by the overwhelming 666, and the audience at the scene are all stunned.
It can be said that the vast majority of people present did not expect Chen Mo to come up with this kind of rhetoric.
Professor Xu's expression was very excited. Obviously he wanted to pat the table and say it was "a bunch of nonsense", but he raised his hands, but he couldn't pat it down.
The other two guests also looked at each other in blank dismay. Obviously, their brains were running fast to refute this set of arguments, but they suddenly ran out of words.
Is there something wrong with what Chen Mo said
Something is wrong!
At least the first reaction of the opposite guests upon hearing Chen Mo's words was, isn't this nonsense
But after a bit of logic from beginning to end, it seems to be quite complete...
The examples cited by Chen Mo, including Mike's satire on capitalism, the words on the police car, and fib-related plots, etc., are indeed found in gta, and it is impossible for Chen Mo to openly spread rumors under the watchful eyes of everyone. Since there are these elements, Chen Mo said that GTA is exposing the ugliness of capitalism, which seems logically very logical.
Moreover, simply grasping the violent elements of gta is actually not very tenable.
When a carrier presents the plot with "exposing" and "criticizing" as the main goal, too much beautification of the scene will greatly reduce this criticism. To put it simply, some essays write about the beheading of the old society, and the ignorant people dipped the blood of the revolutionaries into the steamed buns in an attempt to cure the disease. The dead are much bloodier.
However, if you want to eliminate this bloody and violent influence and over-beautify this plot, then the "criticism" effect it wants to achieve will not exist.
If you force all similar themes to be made like fairy tales, it will only make people feel extremely false, and eventually become complete cultural garbage.
These people's doubts about gta mainly focused on its "violent" appearance, while Chen Mo raised the issue to a higher level of "spiritual connotation", so he directly raised the topic, forming a A "dimensionality reduction strike".
The key to this being true is that gta must have a rich enough connotation.
gta really has it.
Is it a game that encourages crime? Not really.
Most people just scratched the surface a little bit, thinking that gta encourages everyone to commit crimes, but it is not.
GTA does not encourage crime, nor will it induce players to kill indiscriminately. It is not the bloody rivers and lakes that most people think, let alone the unfettered and happy grievances that teenagers yearn for, but the shackles that are getting tighter and tighter. It tells the sorrow of being played by the invisible enemy after defeating the visible enemy time and time again.
In the world of gta, there has never been a stage of falsely relying on crime to marry Bai Fumei and reach the pinnacle of life, but to be constantly betrayed by one's friends, or to betray one's friends, and to have to temporarily bow down to the more powerful black and evil forces , acting as a biting dog for those beasts in fib.
Those stories that seem to stimulate the player's hormones are actually just constantly wiping other people's asses and completing one task after another, but they can never redeem their freedom from fib.
The protagonist who called the wind and rain in the previous work may die like a wild dog in the next work, and no one cares about his life or death.
When first entering the gta world, many people may be addicted to the thrill of killing and looting, but as the plot progresses, players feel the joys and sorrows of the protagonist, and will find that everyone in the story, even those small supporting characters , also have their own sorrow. And the deeper disclosure of the current social situation derived from this is the key to making gta different from a cool game and becoming a full-fledged masterpiece.
…
The debate on "Today's Current Affairs Debate" is still going on, but the wind on the Internet has completely turned to Chen Mo's side.
Of course, Chen Mo's rhetoric cannot conquer everyone. For people like Professor Xu and Chen Baiyou, the position that "violent games will inevitably lead to crime" has been preset in their brains. Much is impossible to convince.
But Chen Mo's words were of course not for the three opposing guests, but for all the audience in front of the TV and computer who were paying attention to this hot topic.
What Chen Mo wants is the support of the public opinion for gta, or at least no opposition, and the tolerance and understanding of the entire social environment for the development of games, especially virtual games.
In the second half of the show, several opposing guests and the audience were still trying to refute Chen Mo's statement, but Chen Mo responded one by one, completely taking the initiative on the scene.
At the end of the show, Hu Yue asked Chen Mo: "Thank you very much Mr. Chen for coming to the "Today's Current Affairs Debate" today to give an official explanation of the gta game, which also allows us to better understand the true connotation of this game. There is a question, which was raised by an audience just now. Traditional violent games may not have much impact, but the matrix game cabin is a next-generation VR. Its sense of immersion and realism far exceeds that of traditional PC and mobile games. Will it have a more serious impact?"
Chen Mo did not answer directly, but asked instead: "May I ask everyone, what do you think is the future of virtual reality technology?"
Hu Yue was taken aback: "The future? I think the future should be closer and closer to the real world."
Chen Mo nodded: "Yes, the so-called virtual reality focuses on 'reality'. Whether some people are willing to admit it or not, the ultimate form of virtual reality will be to perfectly reproduce reality, or even surpass reality. In the future, we will What kind of virtual reality world do you want to create? Is it a 'paradise' where everyone lives and works in peace and where no crime occurs?"
"Sorry, although this is a good wish, it may only exist in the unrealistic ideas of a very few people. Judging from the current literary and artistic works, whether it is novels, movies, TV series, comics or games, similar falsehoods There are almost no images. If you don't believe me, just think about it, is there any popular movie or best-selling book that 'everyone lives in peace and happiness'. I think a similar scene can only be found in heaven."
"Why? Because the vast majority of people don't like this kind of falsehood."
"The development of virtual reality in the future will inevitably be diverse. There are truth, goodness and beauty, as well as fake, evil and ugly. Positive and negative, these are two sides of the same coin. If you remove all the negative things, the positive things will appear false, and the whole world will become pale. Powerlessness. Negative things are meant to stimulate people's yearning for good things, so that they can better understand what is good."
"So, will the violent elements displayed in the next generation of VR have more serious impact? My answer is, no. Not only will it not, but this is the only way for virtual reality. The future virtual world is an all-encompassing World, as for what is good and what is bad, only the most players have the right to judge."