Let's first talk about the relationship and misunderstanding between quantum mechanics and consciousness, and then talk about the paradox of the three gods. .
[About Quantum Mechanics]
If the theory of relativity breaks people's traditional concept of space and time, especially the general theory of relativity breaks people's impression of Newton's gravitation (the word used in physics is not to break, but generally uses the word "correction"), then quantum mechanics breaks people's own concept of gravity. The microcosmic world imagined from the macrocosmic world shows people a completely different microcosmic world.
If we have to give a description of the characteristics of this quantum world, it is: this microscopic world is simply very strange, and we cannot use common sense to speculate, but, it is like that, we can only choose to accept it first, and then look for it the law.
This is probably why quantum mechanics is so charming. It has a certain sense of "divinity", so many people would say a word: The focus of science is theology.
The magic of quantum mechanics is mainly reflected in the fact that it is completely different from the microscopic world we know:
First of all, let me talk about the simplest difference-[Uncertainty Principle]: This is a very important concept of quantum mechanics (by the way, when I first saw this concept in the early days, I thought this book The book is talking nonsense, but the title and the fame of the author have to make me believe that this is an existing scientific progress, because the book is called "A Brief History of Time"), the concept is a physical fact: we are precisely While measuring the position of a particle, it is impossible to measure the velocity of the particle accurately at the same time. Therefore, this concept seems to be also known as the uncertainty principle.
It may be difficult for us to understand this fact in the macroscopic world. We will think that this is a problem of the ability of the existing technological development, but in reality, if we go deeper, we will find that this is an objective fact: when we measure any kind of microscopic particle, there is A measurement method must be selected, and any measurement method is a certain energy method (such as light, ultraviolet light, or other electromagnetic waves, etc.) that touches the microscopic particle and "bounces" back to our receiving instrument. After some calculations, the position of this microscopic particle will be known.
During this process, the most interesting thing happened: because we need energy to collide with this particle, we can know the position of this particle, but if the particle is too small, after being "collided" by the energy we detect, the energy of the particle itself will also Changes occur, so that when we know the position of the particle we want to measure, the actual particle is no longer in this position.
To give an inappropriate example: It seems that in the dark night, we want to know where a ping pong ball is, we can't see it (there is no other way to measure it), so we have to hit it with another ping pong ball, and after the ping pong ball bounces back, we We can calculate where the ping-pong ball we want to know is based on the speed of the ping-pong ball bouncing back, but when we know it, the ping-pong ball is no longer there (the speed has also changed).
This is called the Uncertainty Principle—it's not just a thought experiment, it's an objective fact.
So this can explain to a certain extent why consciousness cannot be accurately calculated.
Regardless of psychology, biology, and neurology, just from the perspective of physics, the basis of the human brain is the microscopic movement of synapses, and the consciousness of the human brain is the overall display of these microscopic movements in the macroscopic.
The microscopic movement of synapses is very likely to conform to the principle of quantum uncertainty, that is, the more we want to know the movement state of all synapses in the human brain at a certain moment, the less we can know the human brain. How the synapses of the brain will move at the next moment, from a macro perspective, this sentence can be translated into—
The more we wonder about what a person is thinking, the more likely that person's thoughts will change. —Of course, this translation is inaccurate.
But we have actually seen many similar situations in similar psychological activities.
For example, you say to a person: Are you thinking about anything right now? The other party answered: no.
Then if you ask: really not? He thought for a while and answered in the affirmative: Really not!
But after that? His consciousness has been influenced by you, and he may think: Am I really thinking about it? Or think: I wonder if I am thinking about something, does this count as thinking about something? Or you may think: What is his purpose in asking this question? Or think: I didn’t even think about anything, so should I think about something
That is to say, when we use a method to measure a person's consciousness, the person's consciousness is likely to change in the next moment—this is also the uncertainty principle of a certain meaning.
Therefore, the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics seems to be a physical rule, but if you think deeply, it is actually a philosophical proposition.
Of course, as a novel, especially a novel, I can’t spend too much ink on this aspect. I just magnify this microscopic quantum law to two macroscopic levels, hoping to look at this issue from different perspectives: the first macroscopic, That is, the macroscopic consciousness of the earth of Jie Tianshi cannot accurately know a certain "microscopic" computing device or person. The second macro is the super-macro consciousness at the cosmic level. It is impossible to know exactly the existence of a certain world master (planetary macro-consciousness).
Of course, if the existing theory of quantum mechanics is completely followed, the two macros will not be able to intersect with the human world (because they are not aware of each other's existence), but this is a novel after all, so Mu Yu designed a "back door", Or "loophole".
As previously known, the main reason for the uncertainty principle is that when measuring microscopic particles, a certain form of energy is needed to affect the particle, so Mu Yu thought, if it is not a certain form of energy that collides with the particle, but this Does the particle itself emit some kind of energy
Using the previous ping-pong ball in the dark as an example, that is, although there is no light in the dark night (there is no measurement method), the ping-pong ball itself will emit light (can emit energy), and the light is large enough to be seen by us In this way, we can know the specific information of this ping-pong ball without having to use some kind of energy measurement method to bounce it and then measure it.
Ideally, this would be the case with the least amount of error, but how could we possibly find particles that would emit light
So in the whole novel, I chose to use the energy means of incense, which can explode in extreme cases (that is, can emit light by itself), to be discovered by the ultra-macroscopic consciousness at the cosmic level. (not strictly rigorous, but also available)
In the whole novel, there are three times in total that this kind of outbreak is discovered by the ultra-macroscopic consciousness: for the first time, Sun Wukong faced a disaster in the world of conferred gods, and used the Great Nirvana Technique, which triggered the ultra-macroscopic consciousness to discover this problem, And thus relieve the disaster. (At the end of the first season, friends who are interested can watch it again); the second time, Hao Ning made two mistakes in the cottage, but absorbed the incense from several magic weapons into Hao Ning In the body, but Hao Ning himself has a physique that cannot be cultivated, so he can only store these mana (incense) and cannot release them (casting spells). After accumulating to a certain extent, he explodes, and then he is discovered by his brother (ultra-macroscopic consciousness); the third time In the face of such an artifact as the Pangu Banner, Sun Wukong turned into countless treasures and money, and poured the mana of the Pangu Banner into Haoning's body, and was finally discovered by Haoning's younger brother (super macroscopic consciousness), and only then did the original dialogue follow.
Among these three times, the first time was partial to theology, the second time was partial to inexplicable, and the third time was conscious.
And the second time was inexplicable, there is a detail that you can pay attention to: in the dark, after his brother told him to go back, Hao Ning first found something like a big wave, and then described it as if he was wrapped in a ball ——This description, you can think of it as a dream, but you can also think that it is a form of observing a certain "wave-particle duality" under the ultra-macroscopic consciousness in the "microcosmic" form of Hao Ning. The wave-particle duality is one of the basic characteristics of our human discovery of electromagnetic waves, or light.
(This stalk seems to be hidden too deep? Well, everyone can understand it as the romance of a man of science and technology)
In short, based on the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics, Mu Yu set up the basic principle that each of the three scales of super macro (universe), macro (earth) and human world cannot discover each other. The basic possibility of discovering each other: the existing space-time particularity of the soul of Haoning’s younger brother, and the “self-illumination” phenomenon of Haoning’s incense explosions several times, constructing three bright scales (especially human and universe-level consciousness) ) of the found features.
By the way, the communication between the macroscopic consciousness of the earth and human beings is also in a similar way, except that it is not the connection between Haoning and Haoran (after all, the ultra-macroscopic consciousness of the universe is too different from human beings, and the required conditions are also harsher). It's Yufei's obsession with Chen Busheng's life and death. As for this part, I will not talk about it in the setting of the world view for the time being. If there is a chance in the later postscript, I will elaborate on it.
After explaining the uncertainty principle, we have entered into a feature of quantum mechanics that is closer to "theology", which is the role of so-called consciousness: the superposition collapse effect of the observer on the microscopic world—— thump, thump, thump, are you excited?
[Observer Effect]: Simply put, the observer effect is also called the observer effect, which describes not a theory, but a physical fact (this is the most terrifying).
This physical fact is: for microscopic particles in the quantum state, if no observer observes it, then their state is the superposition of multiple possible states; if an observer observes it, then their state immediately changes to into a definite state.
The most classic case seems to be: when people conduct double-slit interference experiments on electrons, the experimental results seem to prove that electrons have the possibility of superposition of multiple states, so when people systematically observe the specific states of electrons, the double-slit interference disappears up!
Well, the two paragraphs above may kill many friends who don't care about quantum mechanics. In short, the facts of the two things seem to point to a concept we were once familiar with: I see flowers
When I look at the flower, the flower exists; when I don't look at the flower, the flower disappears!
Nima, isn't this the super idealism we learned when we were young? Isn't it wrong? Why is it discovered by quantum physics that it is so in the microscopic world
Therefore, many people say that the quantum mechanics of physics just proves that the super-distance effect of consciousness on microscopic particles is also the possibility of God.
but! but! but! There is a conceptual error here! The observer here is not a human, and the observation process is not a human. After glancing at the double-slit interference experiment of electrons, and then the experiment changed—anyone who explains the observer effect in this way is basically playing hooligans: How can you be so good? Do you take a look at the experimental results? Who are you, stare at the experiment result, the experiment result changes, stare at who is pregnant? Do you think you are the Guanyin who sent the child
The observer here is actually able to observe a certain microscopic measurement method of the electron beam. The specific measurement method is more complicated, and we will not go into details. We only need to know one thing: the double-slit interference of electrons is invisible to the naked eye. Similarly, the observer's "observation" of quantum effects must not be a simple action of "seeing" with our human eyes, but the observation behavior of the microcosm.
Since the observer is not a person, but a microscopic observation, it seems that the observer effect has nothing to do with consciousness
Hehehe, the pattern Tucson is broken!
Have you forgotten? The world of our Gods Liaozhai has three levels of macro-micro world view!
In other words, macro and micro are essentially relative concepts.
In this way, from the macro perspective of the earth scale or even the universe scale, human beings themselves are a relative microcosm, so is it possible that this "microcosm" of human beings also has a certain meaning of the observer effect, which can also be changed by "observation" What about reality
Like the quantum observer experiment, under normal circumstances, it is impossible for microscopic particles to "observe" other microscopic particles, unless people suddenly think about it and say that I use microscopic methods to observe, Only then will the observer effect appear, which is also the change of reality by the observer.
This process requires two elements, the first element is the microscopic observation method, and the second element is the macroscopic observation intention (the second is generally ignored by people). Generally speaking, the combination of these two is the possibility of the observer effect.
If the human world is regarded as the microcosm, then the combination of the microcosmic means of observation (the human world) and the macroscopic observation intention (the earth scale) can be explained in a common sentence—the unity of man and nature.
The so-called harmony between man and nature may be a state, a goal of cultivation, or an existence.
We call this existence: God.
In other words, at the macro-micro scale of the earth-human beings, the macro-level beliefs produced by people’s souls (quantum state combinations) in the micro-state finally gather in a specific idol body, which is objectively completed. This is an objective process of "harmony between man and nature" from microscopic observation means (human world) to macroscopic observation intention (partial earth scale). It's just that the bigger the process, the longer it takes, the more beliefs, the more effective the process, and the greater the possibility of eventually gathering into a god.
Based on this process, it is the process of the essence of the "Incense and Fire God" of Liaozhai. In the epilogue!
In this way, the gods produced by this process have a certain observer effect on the "microcosmic world" of human beings, and can also change the "microcosmic world" of human beings according to their own observations. Like the microcosmic observers of quantum mechanics, they collapse the quantum state through observation The principle of change is the same. We call this change to the "microcosm" of human beings "[mana]".
Therefore, in this sense, the so-called mana is actually the "distortion" of the human world produced by the "microscopic" observation method under the scale of the human world of "God" to the macroscopic observation intention, and then the observation of the human world—this The concept was difficult to understand, so Guan Zizai only explained it to Xiaohong once, and did not repeat it again. And Xiaohong, a "student", only explained it to Hao Ning once, and then other higher-level people proposed this concept to Hao Ning.
[Mana-About the Distortion Phenomenon of Quantum State to Reality]
Here I want to say that the concept of "distorting" the reality of the human world was not created by Mu Yu, it has two
The first source is the explanation of gravitation by general relativity: Don’t worry, we don’t talk about general relativity, just a small point of it. Einstein’s general relativity has another explanation for the universal gravitation proposed by Newton, which will The explanation of gravity is that objects of different masses will have a "bending" effect on space-time, and this bending effect, in the observation scale of our human beings, is gravity.
So in this book, Mu Yu borrowed this statement, and "embedded it" into the description of the relationship (mana) between the observer effect and reality in quantum mechanics, but benefited from the profoundness of Chinese characters, I did not use curved , using "twisted".
The second source is a tribute to Jobs: Yes, it is the Jobs of the Apple mobile phone. One of Jobs' biggest personal charms is called: reality distortion field. Of course, if you search on Baidu, you will know that this is just an exaggerated description of Jobs' great personal charm. But in the novel Mu Yu romanticizes it, combining this power to distort reality with the effect of the macroscopic quantum state on reality.
In short, through the triple macro-micro scale debate, as well as the extended speculation of the quantum effects discovered by human beings, the source and possibility of surreal events such as gods and mana are explained.
In this sense, Mu Yu has fulfilled the requirements of the introduction to the book "Liao Zhai of the Gods": write with gods without gods, and use gods with gods without gods.
The question is, if everyone accepts such a setting, then in our world, is there a god or no god
So, the following question is very crucial: the paradox of the three gods.
[Three Gods Paradox]
The paradox of the three gods is deduced from the theory of the three gods created by Jie Tianshi (Li Yufei) in this book-this is also very interesting. Originally, a top student majoring in physics discovered the theoretical laws related to gods.
Like all theories, the theory of the three gods first admits the objective facts, then explains the objective facts, and then speculates on some kind of hypothesis.
The objective fact described by the theory of the three gods is that this world (the world of Gods Liaozhai) has gods in three states—
1. Legendary gods: gods described in religion or myths and legends
2. Imagining God: The God that people imagine in their minds because of various legends (including religion) (there should be quantum effects at this time, Keke)
3. Incense and Vulcan God: the real god produced by the continuous condensation of people's souls to the imaginary god (also the god who can distort reality in front of Shuoer).
The relationship between these three states of gods is: [Legendary God]----through legend--->[Imagination God]----through soul belief---->[Incense and Fire God]
Since all three kinds of gods do exist in the world of Gods Liaozhai (it seems that the third kind of god has not been found in our real world), so the essence of this theory is complete and has a specific theoretical basis—for details, please refer to From World View (1) to all content.
But the biggest problem here is also the three big problems in the paradox of the three gods:
[One of the paradoxes of the three gods]: Because of the selfish desires of human beings, the propaganda organization (religion) where the [Legendary God] is located generally does not allow the [Incense and Fire God] to be born to share their power in the world.
To give an extreme example: we know a famous historical event of a certain religion in the West: the incident of the Atonement Roll. The initiator of this incident is the church itself, and it is also the publicity organization of [Legend of God] in the world, so the problem is big. The [Imagination God] in it all requires people to spend money to get to heaven! And the [Incense and Fire God], which was produced because of people's beliefs in the past two hundred years, must also have such characteristics or talents in it.
This is a good thing. People have believed in the concept that Guanyin can send children for hundreds of years. Naturally, with Guanyin, it is only natural that he must have the ability to send children.
But there is a problem in this way, what God needs is people's beliefs, not specific money, and what actually needs money is [Legend God]'s publicity organization in the world, which has produced [Legend God]'s propaganda organization and [ The fundamental contradiction between the God of Incense and Fire, and the existence significance of Mie Shenmen also lies in this. (As for why Mie Shenmen appeared in Huaxia land, I will explain it later)
Using an example, we can continue to deduce: After 1562, the sect that sold the Atonement Scrolls began to stop selling the Atonement Scrolls. Over time, people’s belief in this sect’s belief that God needs to spend money to get to heaven will soon disappear. What should I do with my [Incense Fire God]? This is another contradiction, but this contradiction is not between people and [Xianghuo Shen], it is still a contradiction between [Legendary God]'s propaganda organization and [Xianghuo Shen].
For some other sects, as long as there are people’s desires, some modification of the teachings will lead to a conflict between the desires of gods and people’s desires between the propaganda organizations of [Incense and Fire God] and [Legend God], which is almost a high probability event. The method of this high probability event... you understand.
Of course, the assumption is that in the world of gods, the existence of incense and fire gods is recognized as a contradiction. In our real world, you can choose to admit that there is a Vulcan or there is no Vulcan. It's just that if you choose to admit that there is no incense god, then what is the point of people's belief in gods? If it is admitted that there is an incense god, then how to believe in the incense god that people believe in and the [legendary god]
Are the gods promoted by the publicity agencies consistent? No contradiction
If you continue to speculate on this proposition, you will find the second question of the paradox of the three gods. Yi Ping refers to the answer that he has been thinking about for a long time, which is how the image of this god was recorded before the propaganda agency of [Legend God] publicized this god. In these scriptures, we might as well call the possible god in the propaganda of "Legendary God" as "Primitive God".
So the second big problem with the Three Gods paradox is:
[Three Gods Paradox No. 2]: Why is there no [Primitive God]
This seems to be quite different from our understanding of regular gods. Our general understanding of gods is that there is a certain god who educates human beings. In order to appreciate his existence, human beings set up religions for him, worship him constantly, and provide him with incense (this is the "primitive god"). There doesn't seem to be any mention of this primordial god, why
Because of a theory that Zhou Yuan once put forward: the ship of Theseus. That is, how to define the same "I".
Let me briefly talk about the concept of the ship of Theseus: If the wood of Theseus' ship is gradually replaced until all the wood is not the original wood, is the ship still the original ship
This question Zhou Yuan put forward this concept when answering what is "I" in Futukang (actually you can search it on Baidu), but this concept can still be used in the discussion of [Original God]: if there is really Such a [primitive god], people created a certain religion because of their worship, but this religion changed the original teachings because of human desires or to attract more followers, then people believe in [ The God of Incense and Fire is probably not this [Primitive God] anymore, and as this teaching becomes more universal, more changed, and more advanced with the times, the gap between the God of Incense and the [Original God] will become wider and wider. Big, so big that the final result is likely to be that [Primitive God] has no incense, and [Incense Fire God] is getting bigger and bigger. — This is explained in the novel. Mr. Fei wanted to become a god so much, but he didn't dare to let people establish a religious reason for him.
This is why Jie Tianshi called his theory the theory of the three gods instead of the theory of the four gods: because the [primitive gods] are likely to have disappeared in the long river of history. —Don’t forget, Jie Tianshi himself is a genius in physics, and he only studies the world that can be discovered.
Of course, there is a special case where [Primitive God] and [Incense and Fire God] can coexist peacefully, and even share incense to a certain extent. It is also because of this situation that Guan Zizai has always been Guan Zizai.
This situation is called "Fengshenbang" (romanticization) in the novel, and of course the reason for not actually escaping the ship of Theseus (theoreticalization): not emphasizing one's own way of inheritance.
This sentence seems to be too convoluted. Let's use the sentence in the "Tao Te Ching" to explain: Water benefits all things without competing... Therefore, no one in the world can compete with it.
What does that mean? To put it simply, this ship of Theseus, if it is always emphasized to people that I am this ship of Theseus, I am this ship of Theseus, then every time it changes a part, people will think: This is the ship of Theseus. Yes, that changed, so is this ship still the ship of Theseus
But what if the Ship of Theseus was a different approach? Silently do what a ship should do, what parts should be replaced, and what parts should be replaced. After many years, people will still point to this ship and say: This is the ship of Theseus. My father has been on this boat, and I have been on this boat myself. If at this time a scumbag came out and said, no, the boat your grandfather built back then is no longer the boat you are building today. People would refute the scumbag first without the boat of Theseus coming out to speak.
Water benefits all things but does not compete... Therefore, no one in the world can compete with it-here are two key points, one is to benefit all things, and the other is not to compete.
[Primitive God]The ship of Theseus, under the change of people's beliefs, can also enjoy the incense of the [Incense Fire God]. The two conditions of benefiting all things and not competing are indispensable.
Fortunately, our Huaxia basically meets these two conditions.
Let’s not talk about benefiting all things. There are basically no evil gods in China’s belief in gods. As long as they are gods, they can bring happiness to people. Although the blessings are different, even ghosts from the underworld are not evil. But they are used to catch ghosts—this is different from Western legends: In our Chinese underworld, there are gods, and little ghosts are wage earners, and they are used to reincarnate people. And the underground in the West is full of demons, who are used to tempt people to make mistakes. In the same western belief, people who believe in the emperor go to heaven, but those who don’t believe in the emperor go to hell. It doesn’t matter if you do bad things, you can go to heaven with a little money (refer to the previous Atonement Scroll incident); in our world, if you do good deeds, you can reincarnate and be a good person, continue to be in the world of mortals, be infatuated and affectionate, and walk freely Once, you did something bad and not only you were shot in Yangjian, but you also had to be shot hundreds of times in the underworld—isn’t it a cute setting
It's a long way off, but generally speaking, the gods of Huaxia are satisfied with the theory of benefiting all things, and then there is [Indisputable].
Let's put it this way, among all ethnic groups, all the gods in the Chinese nation are almost the most [indisputable]. You can see the saints of Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism gathered together in the Xuankong Temple in Shanxi, accepting people's worship frankly, You can also see that everyone who comes to the Xuankong Temple will not start a "jihad" in the Xuankong Temple because of this person's belief and that person's belief in the Buddha. Looking back at the history of the world, the entire Crusades in the West Conquering history is basically a history of constant [contests]: competing to spread the Gospel of the Communist Party of China, fighting to kill heretics, and fighting to make other nationalities insist on believing in their own beliefs, so that when I first looked at this history, Mu Yu Xin couldn't help but wondered: Crazy! No matter how much you fight, you can't believe it
It’s okay to say this in China (actually we also do the same, anyway, if something goes wrong, we usually worship whatever we can), if we go abroad, we must never dare to say that when we arrive in certain countries, because Even if it is beaten into a pig's head, it is light.
So we can't help but ask a question: Why is Huaxia so special
The reason is: an event in the Yin and Shang Dynasties: Wu Yi shot into the sky. The specific story is as follows: Wu Yi was the king of the Yin and Shang Dynasties. At that time, Yin people worshiped gods very much. In order to change this state, Wu Yi, as a king, set up a big bamboo pole and hung a cowhide water bag on it. The blood was let out inside, and then I said that you kept talking about the sky, I don't believe it, I will let you see how I shot through the sky today. Then he took an arrow and shot at the bag. The bag is broken, but Wu Yi is fine. There are many ways to interpret this story, one of which is to break people’s superstition about gods at that time. History calls this event the significance of it—playing an exemplary role in the transition from theocracy to kingship.
We don't discuss specific events, but we at least know that from the Yin and Shang Dynasties to the Qing Dynasty, during the past two years, all the gods and religions no longer had the power to inform the people of China. The demand is replaced by the monarchy to rule the people-this means that after the Yin and Shang Dynasties, all the gods in China have met the condition of [indisputable].
Therefore, even if the gods of China have their own propaganda organization (religion), they will coexist peacefully with the people of China because of the characteristics of "indisputable" and under the characteristics of "benefiting all things". Only, naturally, it can last forever in Chinese history.
In this sense, the Conferred Gods List can enable the [Original God] and the [Xianghuo God] to share the essence of incense, because the [Original God] in it has been conferred a god through the Conferred Gods List.
And who made it a god? Mortal Jiang Ziya!
Since it is a god conferred by mortals, then this [Primitive God] is not imposed on mortals. The belief thus generated can naturally be shared with [Incense and Fire God].
It's just that Fei Changfang probably doesn't understand this truth.
To put it bluntly, the people will not overthrow the people themselves, and the vitality of the gods enshrined by the people is far greater than the gods who insist on forcing people—this is why the Mie Shenmen came from China.
Of course, speaking mainly of novelists, there is neither a position of belief nor a denigration of any religion—on the contrary, the teachings in many religions are very worthy of deep study and have their own value, and we are just discussing—assuming that belief can become Some possibilities of God.
By the way, the setting of faith becoming a god has actually been mentioned in many books, but it seems to be only mentioned in the Western "American Gods", but "American Gods" is mainly based on faith Under the setting of being able to become a god, the stories between the various gods, the so-called struggle, are also more competitions for beliefs.
And "Liao Zhai of the Gods" mainly writes about the gods of China, everyone is having fun, so what is there to argue about? So Mu Yu has more pen and ink to explore why faith can become a god, as well as some theories and inferences under the assumption that faith can become a god.
The third big question of the paradox of the three gods is: How did the original description of the gods in the "legendary gods" come from without considering the "primitive gods"
This book gives two methods, one is the "self-understanding" produced by some wise men who happened to see the ultra-macroscopic consciousness at the cosmic scale, and the second is that more wise men, based on certain factors, feel Inspiration from the future as well as the past.
No matter which of these two, there is a chance for these wise men to create a set of [Legendary God] content.
The key here is not the small probability of seeing the ultra-macroscopic consciousness at the cosmic scale, but the influence of the more common inspiration system on wise men of different eras. Haoran calls this influence:
[Conscious self-evolutionary behavior of human beings as a whole]
Therefore, another key point here is the main thing that "Liao Zhai of the Gods" has been describing: self-evolution.
We will talk about this topic later.
(end of this chapter)
/44/4ml