The debate officially started after the host Liu Na's introduction. The main topic was traditional criminal investigation, and the four members were high-achieving students in forensic science, administrative science, and trace science.
The opponents are all high-achieving criminal psychology students. It is undeniable that the times are advancing, and people's thinking is also evolving rapidly. In the past two years, more and more people have applied for criminal psychology, and Ye Chen can understand this. Everyone has that kind of vanity. After reading the crime scene and related testimony, he can profile the various characteristics of the murderer. This is not a means to show off his skills.
Although Ye Chen has not specifically studied criminal psychology, he has borrowed criminal psychology in many places through ordinary accumulation. However, many of Ye Chen's reasoning are based on the traceology of the scene and the later forensic reports. Most of his ability to figure out the murderer's idea is because of his wild imagination and natural intuition.
If he really wanted to say it, Ye Chen wanted to admit that he was taking the traditional criminal investigation path.
The two parties on the podium started a fierce debate after they stated their main points. Judging from their arguments and some professional terms in criminal investigation, they are indeed high-achieving students with a bright future.
There is no cold field, no matter how sharp questions the other party can answer. Had it not been for Ye Chen to appreciate this debate with his thoughts, he would definitely enjoy the arguments of these people.
For a time, the two sides really couldn't see the difference. At this moment, Zhengfang Erbian suddenly pointed his palm to Ye Chen sitting in the first row. "on
Take our senior Ye Chen as an example. He was able to infer that the police caught the wrong murderer by just using the case file and some information in the criminal investigation class. Is this because his psychological profile tells him it is wrong? Isn't it judged because of the reasoning logic ability cultivated by traditional criminal investigation? "
Ye Chen smiled bitterly and shook his head. He really didn't expect that even such old things would be dug out. But his heart tightened even more. The other party could understand him this way, obviously he had made sufficient preparations, and the purpose may be for the so-called game.
"Senior Ye Chen was able to infer that the person arrested was not the murderer, so naturally he has his brilliance. But how many senior Ye Chen in this world?" The opponent's second argument immediately responded, "Know that At that time, the criminal psychology in China was not mature, let alone the profile of the murderer. If there was an academic profiler at the time, how could the situation of catching the wrong murderer happen?"
He lifted a rock and hit him in the foot, and the square's Erbian did not immediately pick up the conversation for the first time, which also caused applause from the audience.
But soon, the intelligent three debates immediately changed the subject, put aside Ye Chen's own problems, and returned to the general direction.
Ye Chen looked at Liu Na's position pretendingly, and sure enough, she was watching Ye Chen. But... She was too unscrupulous in seeing this, she didn't care what others would think of her, she also showed the appearance of a little fan.
After the conclusion of the four debates between the two sides, the audience immediately burst into applause. willow
Na stepped onto the podium, still with a youthful smile, she said: "It really was a fierce debate. I know that in private, many classmates have argued because of these two concepts. But after all, I His major is also criminal psychology, so I cannot judge this debate too much."
With that, Liu Na looked at Ye Chen again, "Or, did we ask Senior Ye Chen to comment on this debate?"
Listening to the twittering of the classmates in the audience, Ye Chen knew that he would never escape, so he stood up and walked to the podium. "Uh, how do you say? In fact, I think the purpose of these two methods is the same, both are to solve the case. Then based on the premise of solving the case, the way to find the murderer is the best. Just like doing math problems, A person who knows the two methods is always better than the person who knows the one method, because if this path fails, he has another way."
The moment Ye Chen stood on the podium, the audience fell silent. But listening to Ye Chen's innocent polite words on both sides, some students' faces already looked disappointed.
"Since it's a debate, there should be a victory or defeat, right?" The audience didn't know who asked this sentence, and everyone's gaze for knowledge immediately gathered on Ye Chen.
"This... I don't understand the debate after all. I can't be a referee?" Ye Chen is not stupid. He can see that everyone in the audience has his own stand. The person is bound to be disappointed. He didn't want to stifle the enthusiasm of these future policemen. (End of this chapter)