Many things have two sides. You may get another answer from another perspective, but if the matter involves yourself, then the answer is the only one. r?a? ?nw?en?ｗ?ｗ?ｗ?．
Those who want to buy a house will say that the country's housing policy is not good, and those who need to work will say that the employment environment is not good. Even if they can't find a girlfriend, some people will complain. Why has the traditional arranged marriage been abandoned
Feng Yu can understand the difficulties at the top, but that doesn't mean he recognizes these situations. Because this is the job of the political axe, if it is not done well, it means it is unqualified.
If you don't do what I'm most satisfied with, but you're relatively satisfied, of course that's fine, but you can't let me see you working easier than me and earning more than me, especially since you're still a more powerful official than many common people!
People can never be satisfied. Even if someone like Feng Yu is the richest man in the world, doesn't he want to trample those big financial groups under his feet
"Old Zhang, I understand all the difficulties you mentioned, but what do you care about me? This is what you should do. You should find ways to meet the people's requirements. The people will not put forward some absolutely unreasonable requirements, but Some reasonable requests for you to improve this, right?"
"Of course we are making improvements. Many people think that our annual People's Congress is just a formality. But they don't know that many of the country's policies are discussed and passed at this meeting. If you don't come to the meeting, if you come to the meeting , you know that many things are really not simple." After speaking, Zhang Ruiqiang stared at Feng Yu.
Feng Yu thought for a while: "I know what you said, but I am not a National People's Congress representative! Don't say that I can represent many people. How many employees do I have in my company? How many families do you think are the same as mine? Representatives should be selected from the majority of the population, and I am not suitable."
Zhang Ruiqiang really couldn't refute Feng Yu's statement. Based on Feng Yu's status as the world's richest man, no one can say that he is in the same group as Feng Yu, not to mention that Feng Yu, the richest man, is still far ahead in terms of assets.
As for the CPPCC, there is no need to think about it. Feng Yu has stated many times that he does not want to participate in politics, and no one can persuade him. But when the country needs him, he will never stand idly by.
Some people also think that Feng Yu is good for the country. Now there are comments on the Internet that Feng Yu should be the leader of the country. If Feng Yu is allowed to take a high position, maybe something will happen.
If Feng Yu is good at it, then it is not impossible for Feng Yu to sit in a certain seat, but Feng Yu is not interested in this and is not good at it at all. If he sits in that seat rashly, trouble will inevitably occur.
Although there are many people abroad who have become politicians from other industries, it is because they like and are willing to do this job, and they have the support of a huge team.
Feng Yu was unwilling at first, so what else could he talk about
"Actually, I have some opinions, and I have them, too, and that is the improvement of the legal system. For example, some sentencing should be harsher, and we should not be lenient."
"For example, traffickers, listen to the voices of the people. Although the death penalty is not suitable, can the sentencing be increased? They will be imprisoned for a few more years, and high fines will also be imposed, and the commutation of the sentence should be more stringent. Not even a reduced sentence.”
"For example, thieves, why can't they be defined as criminals for those who refuse to change despite repeated admonitions? Do you know that many of them steal and bring major changes to many families?"
"There are still many cases involving the majority of people and families, and the opinions of those people should be listened to when sentencing. In addition, the penalties for those who buy children, wives, etc. should also be increased to prevent them from committing the crime again."
Except for crimes of passion, most criminals weigh the benefits of committing a crime against the possible punishment they may receive.
This is why many thieves refuse to change despite repeated admonitions, because if they are caught, they will only be detained for a period of time and will be released soon. Then they get used to being idle and return to their old jobs. Some thieves even regard the police station as a Second home, because I come in often.
There are also frauds and so on. Many of them are not punished severely, but they cause great harm to the people who are deceived. This kind of harm is much more serious than if they are sent to the hospital.
"Someone has mentioned what you mentioned, and it is still being improved. Many laws cannot be changed quickly, especially all aspects must be taken into consideration, and foreign laws must be studied and compared to avoid making people feel that our laws are It’s so different.”
Feng Yuxin said that there are too many alternative laws. Many states in the United States and many countries in Europe have some weird laws. For example, if you sing out of tune, you will be fined. If you cut down a cactus, you will face jail time and so on.
But there is no doubt that most laws in most countries around the world are similar.
"Actually, if you think about it, the national conditions of each country are different. Some of our laws are a bit strict, but it doesn't seem to be a big deal. Some laws can even be tried out, and netizens can even vote for them. Do you think this is child's play? I think it is. This will make our laws more accepted by the people and considered fair."
If we were to choose whether traffickers should be sentenced to death, it is estimated that most people would choose yes, a small number of people would choose not, a small number of people would choose to see the situation, and a small number of people would abstain.
I believe that from a personal emotional point of view, this is a subjective motive for committing a crime, not a fight or something like that. It may be due to a sudden conflict. Knowing that it may cause great harm to other people's families and lives, why should there not be a harsh sentence
Recently, Feng Yu asked his charity foundation to set up a family tracing fund to help some parents who have lost their children find their relatives, and also help some children who want to find their parents to find their families.
A website provides detailed information, and then the website will intelligently search for matches, and use current technological means to determine the possibility that you two are relatives, and finally use paternity testing to determine.
So far, we have only helped a few families find their children, and many others are still struggling to find them.
Zhang Ruiqiang still didn't agree and just said to go back and discuss it. Although he emotionally agrees with Feng Yu's proposal, this kind of social issue still needs to be demonstrated in detail. Every law cannot be formulated based on emotion alone.
For example, someone hacked a girl to death, but surrendered and was sentenced to life, but the girl's father thought it was not enough and tried to kill the prisoner.
Emotionally we can understand what the father did, but did he commit a crime? Is it really fair for you to acquit this girl's father? What if someone's parents kill the girl's father
"Forget it, Feng Yu, let's leave these matters to more professional people to discuss, but we will definitely solicit the opinions of the people, not just talk, but really do it. So you still don't want to take charge of state-owned assets? Okay, It's up to you. Anyway, if something happens to you outside, remember that you are Chinese and have a country."
…