Readers from Earth would definitely recognize the opening of Sherlock Holmes:
This scene is a bit like the British TV series "Sherlock Holmes".
That's right.
Lin Yuan referred to some TV series of Sherlock Holmes.
The original work is not perfect, and Lin Yuan will certainly not adopt it completely. For example, when Sherlock Holmes encountered the case of the spotted belt, he made a wrong inference.
This reasoning is based on the fact that snakes have hearing and drink milk.
But this is not the author's fault.
People of that era really didn’t understand.
A similar situation also occurred in "The Mysteries of Poirot".
As a modern person, Lin Yuan would certainly not adopt the unscientific basis made by the author in the original novel due to the constraints of the times.
And at this time.
Cao Dezhi couldn't wait to continue watching—
He was so curious about how Holmes knew this information!
Of course fortune-telling is impossible.
If that's the case, then Chu Kuang must have classified this novel in the wrong category.
Go out and turn left next door, there is a fantasy novel department.
Since it is a mystery novel, Holmes must have obtained the answer through reasoning!
What is the basis for the reasoning
With such curiosity, Cao Dezhi looked very carefully.
At this time, he no longer subconsciously compared Holmes and Poirot.
Judging from the early performance, Holmes and Poirot, the two people called great detectives by Chu Kuang, are completely different in character, way of speaking, etc.
Holmes is so conceited!
In fact, Poirot is also very conceited, but how do you describe Holmes' conceit
This man actually vowed:
Although others witnessed various details with their own eyes, they still could not solve some problems, but Sherlock Holmes could explain some difficult problems even without leaving his house.
Listen to this!
Is this human language
Even Poirot wouldn't let you pretend like this!
What's even more pretentious is that Holmes actually said that other detectives in London were worthless. He even disdained to label himself as a detective, and instead called himself a "consulting detective"!
Um.
Detective consultant, this is a new profession invented by Holmes himself. He feels that he is the only person on the blue planet who does this job: Whenever the police have a problem that they cannot solve, they will come to me, and of course the detectives in London do the same.
Do you mean that others are detectives and you are a master detective
The only man in the entire Blue Planet who could make Holmes understand what "humility" is was the dead Poirot.
Um.
Holmes only recognized Poirot's ability.
Cao Dezhi was a little upset when he saw this passage.
Boss Chu Kuang, can we not play like this
You said you would write about Sherlock Holmes so why did you mention Poirot? Are you afraid that readers will think you killed Poirot yourself
It's alright if you mention Poirot.
Do you still compare Holmes to Poirot
Looking at Holmes's posture, it seems that only Poirot in the world can be compared with him, Sherlock Holmes.
Too crazy!
Although Holmes did not show any complacency in the narration of the article, but said such words in a calm, slightly nostalgic tone, as if he was stating a fact, it is absolutely unforgivable for Poirot fans!
In the hearts of Poirot fans, no one can compare with him!
You wrote Sherlock Holmes so brilliantly at the beginning, aren't you afraid that you won't be able to finish it
This Sherlock Holmes is such a bully!
same.
Watson in the book also thinks Holmes is too pretentious.
This puts Watson and Cao Dezhi, the reader, on the same side.
But Watson was soon defeated by Holmes's reasoning:
"When we first met yesterday, you looked surprised when I mentioned the battlefield of Relou."
"How do you know?"
Watson raised his voice: "Someone must have told you!"
"I don't know, I observe."
Holmes' tone was the same as always: "Your face is tanned, but your wrists are not, so you have been to tropical areas, and not for sunbathing. Your hairstyle and manners are military style, and both your movements and postures are full of the efficiency of a soldier. And your conversation with Mike when you entered the door shows that you have studied at Hanzhou Medical College like him, so you are obviously a military doctor. You walk with a severe limp, but would rather stand than sit down, and you have completely forgotten about your disability, so at least part of your disability is psychogenic. And you were injured on a battlefield in the wild, so where is the battlefield nowadays for military doctors to be exposed to the sun and injured? Oh, it's the battlefield of Relu."
Watson was stunned by this reasoning!
Cao Dezhi, who thought he was on the same front with Watson, was also stunned. He never expected that Holmes had seen through everything based on his first meeting with Watson!
Oh shit!
What an amazing power of observation!
Poirot also had similar brainstorming moments, and the process was equally exciting, but Poirot's way of reasoning was definitely different from Holmes'.
Poirot seems to prefer to speculate on human nature.
Holmes came to his conclusions by observing countless details and summarizing information!
The former is more emotional, while Holmes is more rational!
This was the first time Cao Dezhi felt that although Holmes had the potential to become a king of forcing, his brain was indeed working at an astonishing speed. Unfortunately, he could not find a foothold to refute this reasoning...
Is this a coincidence
Did Sherlock Holmes just happen to find a clue
Of course not!
As Cao Dezhi continued to flip through the book with a slightly shocked look, Holmes officially began his first reasoning show!
hair…
Leather bags...
nail…
At the murder scene, he could infer countless information from the first victim's sleeves, boots, pants, knees, calluses between the thumb and index finger, the expression before death, including the cuffs of the shirt, etc.!
Careful!
reason!
No matter how complicated the information is, he could summarize it in his mind and grasp key clues. He could even draw conclusions about how many people were in the carriage based on the traces of the carriage near the murder case and the depth of the indentations!
Logical deduction
That's not the case!
Logical deduction is to use results to infer processes, which is what Poirot is good at, but Holmes seems to be better at using processes to infer results, and these processes are the answers obtained through the various details mentioned above!
You can imagine.
When this series of reasoning shows appeared in front of Cao Dezhi, Cao Dezhi's scalp almost numbed. In front of him, there seemed to appear an image of a man with a hooked nose wearing a bowler hat and holding a pipe. His eyes should be rational and revealing the wisdom of observation. All these reasonings are based on a theory of Sherlock Holmes:
Elementary!
The case can be roughly divided into two parts. The first part is that Holmes uses his so-called deductive method to find the murderer of the serial murders; the second part is the murderer's motive and the tragic experience he has suffered. This is a sympathetic murderer who is taking revenge in his own way.
The story is finished.
Cao Dezhi was stunned.
This was the first time that Cao Dezhi, as a Blue Star person, faced the shock brought by Sherlock Holmes and Elementary, and the same shocking feeling rose from the hearts of the editors in the next meeting room—
Horrible Sherlock Holmes!
————
ps: I dare not write too much details to avoid being criticized for being too watery. I will continue to update. The following is the part where the leader will add more chapters.