On the other hand, it means that after the medical records were found out, not only did the doubts not be answered, but the doubts were deepened.
No wonder Teacher Yuan Fang just found the medical records here, pondered for herself, and didn't express her opinion for a long time.
I see. For example, Li Qi'an and the others who couldn't see the problem before finally understood where the "gold" discovered by Xie was.
In this way, could it be that the researchers made a mistake
First of all, this is the data collected in the database. Before the data in scientific research papers are not cited, it has little to do with scientific research, and at most it is used in today's teaching.
Ordinary data collection is most likely pathological slides made by students for teachers. For the diagnosis, the students temporarily cite the final diagnosis of the clinician as the label, which cannot be said to be completely wrong.
"Say it's definitely not a heart attack? It can't be completely ruled out right now," Cao Yudong said again.
For some intractable diseases with unclear medical history, it is too difficult to make a medical diagnosis, and in more cases it can only become a point of discussion in the medical circle. Unless the patient's family members have follow-up needs for doctors to pursue the truth, otherwise, they can only wait for doctors or scientific researchers to suddenly have this interest or task needs, and then slowly explore this case in depth. who let no matter
Both research and clinical work are too busy, and there are too many medical cases to deal with. What's more, everyone knows that such a case is very likely to be discussed over and over again and finally continue to fail to get the correct answer.
Maybe someone thought of forensics at this time. Whether forensic medicine can completely solve the mystery of all deaths. The answer is no.
One of the foundations of forensic science is medicine. It is impossible for forensic doctors to make a breakthrough on their own when medicine fails to solve all the mysteries of medicine. Therefore, it will be found on the news that in some highly controversial cases, everyone suspected that it was a murder case. In the end, the forensic doctor came to the conclusion that they failed to give conclusive evidence of the murder. It can only be said that the patient died of ordinary
Multiple organ failure etc.
Speaking of this, Teacher Yuan Fang once again mentioned the cautious style of classmate Xie: "She didn't say that it was not a myocardial infarction, but that it was not typical. She wanted to check the medical records and gross specimens again." If the gross specimens and medical records can prove that it is myocardial infarction, This pathological slide can be a special case among the pathological slides of myocardial infarction, as a valuable teaching material for atypical cases. So thank you for your caution
Doubt makes sense.
"Are there any gross specimens?" Cao Yudong asked his colleagues.
Teacher Yuan Fang said: "I'm afraid this may not be possible." Gross specimens are more difficult to preserve than sliced specimens, taking up more volume and consuming more resources. It is not possible to preserve a gross specimen of all the organs of a corpse. Organs for gross specimens should be selected, usually
Select those with research value to save. Moreover, during the preservation process, some general specimens can only be eliminated if there are problems with some unforeseen factors over the years.
In a word, it is very expensive for scientific research institutes to engage in these things, just like using dead people for research.
If there is no general specimen, if you want to continue to explore this case, you can only rely on the only fragmentary data currently available. Speaking of the biggest feature of this pathological section is a large piece of myocardial fibrosis. If you remember the case of Xiao Shugang, it was mentioned that ischemia leads to the death of myocardial cells and the formation of cardiac scars, referring to myocardial fibrosis.