Moreover, this paper is of a preliminary exploration nature, and it is more to open up a new way of thinking for other medical researchers.
On the contrary, you, a non-general surgery reviewer, did not read other people's manuscripts, what conclusions are you rushing to draw? ?
The eyes of a large number of colleagues on this person only include the police's speculation on the motive of the first suspect in solving the case: Do you have any personal grievances with someone and what do you want to do
You must know that your behavior completely violates the scientific code of conduct of a medical scientist.
Su Lima's face instantly turned purple, like a balloon that would explode at any time.
Seeing this, Will seemed to understand that he was very likely to be fooled by someone. Here I want to say that he, the editor-in-chief, has never received any complaint emails from the contributor Dr. Xie to the reviewers, but he has paid attention to Dr. Xie's special innovative paper. Until the fourth review, reviewer Su
Lima told him that the editor-in-chief of this paper might be tricky. The so-called tricky refers to the suspicion of academic misconduct in the contributor's paper. The editorial department is definitely not looking for reviewers to review manuscripts casually. Sulima was selected as the fourth reviewer because of the fact that Sulima has made achievements in the basic research of myocardial fibrosis, and may be able to understand it at a deeper level. this
A unique insight in a paper by a young doctor Xie. Therefore, as the editor-in-chief, he must first listen to the opinions of expert reviewers. In addition, the young doctor Xie did not raise any objections to him and Su Lima, which made him think that Su Lima was right. Of course, if Dr. Xie raised an objection, given her young qualifications, he, the editor-in-chief, should be in favor
Sulima tends to be more highly qualified, so...
When the explosion happened today, Wilson had an epiphany that his and Sulima's thoughts had already been figured out by others. It wasn't because they were guilty of academic misconduct and did not protest, but simply ignored him and Sulima.
There is far more than just his journal in the world, and researchers don't need to hang themselves from a tree, let alone their strength is really leveraged.
Wilson rested his fingers on his forehead and repented. What he regretted was: I should not have underestimated young generals, especially this young Dr. Xie. Unlike him, Su Lima, who took the initiative to stir up trouble, has interests in her body, so how could she fall down at will. While blushing, Su Lima defended herself and continued to attack the other party: I have received information about her
The manuscript of the project, so I question whether you can understand the model she built.
Everyone was surprised, could this be regarded as the guy in front of him revealing something stupid or bad
It proves that not all scholars are as noble as saints, scholars are human beings, and as long as they have selfish intentions, they can turn academics into dirty at any time.
After the scene started, the voice of everyone discussing Xie's research topic has not weakened.
Gao Zhaocheng asked Shi Xu again: "How is her basic cardiovascular research applied to your project?"
The principle has been mentioned earlier, but what about the specific operation? The three major gravitational factor lines are a predictive model proposed by Xie, a set of models she obtained from exploring the development of cardiac fibrosis. This model divides three red lines according to the influence of gravity on the structure of the human heart. Every
Crossing a red line the disease enters a phase of accelerated development. When the three red lines are completed, the human heart is basically scrapped and irreversible. Due to individual differences in the human body, it is impossible for the three red lines to be exactly the same on an individual, so the red line model is an extremely complicated calculation formula.