As one of the four top journals in mathematics, almost any mathematics-related laboratory or research institute will order "Annals of Mathematics".
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
If the idea itself is wrong, then there is no question of whether it is correct or not.
In 2014, a Kazakh mathematician Otelbayev claimed to have proved the existence and smoothness of the NS equation, which caused considerable controversy in the international mathematics community.
Terence Tao's office is naturally no exception.
Time passed like this.
Looking at the title of the paper, Terence Tao's face showed interest.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
Regardless of whether he is studying the "existence and smoothness of solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", a century-old problem that has been rewarded by the Clay Institute, the mathematical methods he uses will bring great benefits to colleagues who study this proposition. Quite an inspiration.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
Lu Zhou
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
In 2014, a Kazakh mathematician Otelbayev claimed to have proved the existence and smoothness of the NS equation, which caused considerable controversy in the international mathematics community.
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
"NS equation?"
Time passed like this.
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
"NS equation?"
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
Looking at the title of the paper, Terence Tao's face showed interest.
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
Unable to control his curiosity, Tao Zhexuan temporarily put down the pen in his hand, followed the page number behind the title, and turned to the page where the paper was located.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
"NS equation?"
Lu Zhou
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
And, share your thoughts!
Looking at the title of the paper, Terence Tao's face showed interest.
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
That is to update the blog.
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
Then, something even more awesome happened.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
When it comes to the field of partial differentials, among the scholars who have studied NS equations, "TAO, who knows a little bit about everything," can probably be regarded as the leader.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
After all, even though the NS equation is very widely used in application fields, it is too difficult for pure mathematics to make enough results on this proposition to be published in the "Annals of Mathematics"!
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
Unable to control his curiosity, Tao Zhexuan temporarily put down the pen in his hand, followed the page number behind the title, and turned to the page where the paper was located.
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Professor Tao took a blank piece of draft paper from the table and picked up the pen again. With a serious look in his eyes, he carefully read the calculations line by line on the paper.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
And according to his habit of blogging, although he rarely puts serious academic content on his blog, the information he conveys through his blog has often been verified by himself.
Lu Zhou
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
And, share your thoughts!
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
[
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.
"NS equation?"
That is to update the blog.
In 2014, a Kazakh mathematician Otelbayev claimed to have proved the existence and smoothness of the NS equation, which caused considerable controversy in the international mathematics community.
Professor Tao took a blank piece of draft paper from the table and picked up the pen again. With a serious look in his eyes, he carefully read the calculations line by line on the paper.
"NS equation?"
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Time passed like this.
Time passed like this.
Terence Tao's office is naturally no exception.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Of course, if you want to understand the beauty of this paper more deeply, you have to spend more time reading it carefully.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
Instead it’s like…
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Then, something even more awesome happened.
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
And according to his habit of blogging, although he rarely puts serious academic content on his blog, the information he conveys through his blog has often been verified by himself.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
Regardless of whether he is studying the "existence and smoothness of solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", a century-old problem that has been rewarded by the Clay Institute, the mathematical methods he uses will bring great benefits to colleagues who study this proposition. Quite an inspiration.
Because this scholar is much more advanced than Professor Enoch, who claimed to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis the following year. He is considered a serious mathematician. He can complete the operation from preprint to journal submission in one go, so he has not been criticized. Ruthless cold shoulder.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Of course Terence Tao, who only speaks Cantonese and English, cannot understand Russian, but this does not hinder the genius of this genius.
"Professor Lu is really amazing..."
Unable to control his curiosity, Tao Zhexuan temporarily put down the pen in his hand, followed the page number behind the title, and turned to the page where the paper was located.
Lu Zhou
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
"Professor Lu is really amazing..."
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
Instead it’s like…
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
Because this scholar is much more advanced than Professor Enoch, who claimed to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis the following year. He is considered a serious mathematician. He can complete the operation from preprint to journal submission in one go, so he has not been criticized. Ruthless cold shoulder.
"Professor Lu is really amazing..."
Then, something even more awesome happened.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
Unable to control his curiosity, Tao Zhexuan temporarily put down the pen in his hand, followed the page number behind the title, and turned to the page where the paper was located.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
Of course, if you want to understand the beauty of this paper more deeply, you have to spend more time reading it carefully.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
Time passed like this.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Instead it’s like…
Then, something even more awesome happened.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
Because this scholar is much more advanced than Professor Enoch, who claimed to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis the following year. He is considered a serious mathematician. He can complete the operation from preprint to journal submission in one go, so he has not been criticized. Ruthless cold shoulder.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
In the next "big game"
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
In the next "big game"
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
This conclusion was recognized by many scholars in the field of partial differential equations at the time, and facts have proven that his speculation was correct.
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
According to what I know about him, his advantage is that he is good at using a variety of mathematical tools, and his involvement in different research fields is the broadest among the scholars I have seen. Not only that, his ability to understand and use mathematical tools is also rare among the scholars I have seen.
That is to update the blog.
Time passed like this.
"Professor Lu is really amazing..."
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
Of course, if you want to understand the beauty of this paper more deeply, you have to spend more time reading it carefully.
Terence Tao's office is naturally no exception.
And, share your thoughts!
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
And, share your thoughts!
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
[
Instead it’s like…
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
However, after Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou has been silent for more than a year and has not published a mathematical paper in the strict sense. As a result, many people doubted whether this genius was tired of mathematics.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
Terence Tao's office is naturally no exception.
"NS equation?"
After all, even though the NS equation is very widely used in application fields, it is too difficult for pure mathematics to make enough results on this proposition to be published in the "Annals of Mathematics"!
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
According to what I know about him, his advantage is that he is good at using a variety of mathematical tools, and his involvement in different research fields is the broadest among the scholars I have seen. Not only that, his ability to understand and use mathematical tools is also rare among the scholars I have seen.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
This conclusion was recognized by many scholars in the field of partial differential equations at the time, and facts have proven that his speculation was correct.
By setting a special initial value, he proved that the smooth solution corresponding to the initial value would lose regularity in a finite time. This is equivalent to finding a counterexample, skipping the proof process, and logically denying the correctness of this idea.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Unable to control his curiosity, Tao Zhexuan temporarily put down the pen in his hand, followed the page number behind the title, and turned to the page where the paper was located.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
[
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
"NS equation?"
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
]
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
"NS equation?"
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
When it comes to the field of partial differentials, among the scholars who have studied NS equations, "TAO, who knows a little bit about everything," can probably be regarded as the leader.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
Lu Zhou
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
]
In the next "big game"
Of course, we have to admit that this is very, very difficult!
"NS equation?"
However, after Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou has been silent for more than a year and has not published a mathematical paper in the strict sense. As a result, many people doubted whether this genius was tired of mathematics.
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
When it comes to the field of partial differentials, among the scholars who have studied NS equations, "TAO, who knows a little bit about everything," can probably be regarded as the leader.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
Although Perelman, who solved Pang's conjecture, had a withdrawn personality, he at least wrote his paper in English. But Mr. Oterbayev seemed not to be good at English. He wrote in Russian, and the article was 90 pages long, which directly discouraged a large number of interested colleagues.
In 2014, a Kazakh mathematician Otelbayev claimed to have proved the existence and smoothness of the NS equation, which caused considerable controversy in the international mathematics community.
And, share your thoughts!
It took Professor Tao a whole morning to read the paper from beginning to end.
When it comes to the field of partial differentials, among the scholars who have studied NS equations, "TAO, who knows a little bit about everything," can probably be regarded as the leader.
However, after Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou has been silent for more than a year and has not published a mathematical paper in the strict sense. As a result, many people doubted whether this genius was tired of mathematics.
"NS equation?"
Because this scholar is much more advanced than Professor Enoch, who claimed to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis the following year. He is considered a serious mathematician. He can complete the operation from preprint to journal submission in one go, so he has not been criticized. Ruthless cold shoulder.
Of course, if you want to understand the beauty of this paper more deeply, you have to spend more time reading it carefully.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
In the next "big game"
But now it seems that all the rumors are self-defeating.
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
That is to update the blog.
In 2014, a Kazakh mathematician Otelbayev claimed to have proved the existence and smoothness of the NS equation, which caused considerable controversy in the international mathematics community.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
Instead it’s like…
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
Although Perelman, who solved Pang's conjecture, had a withdrawn personality, he at least wrote his paper in English. But Mr. Oterbayev seemed not to be good at English. He wrote in Russian, and the article was 90 pages long, which directly discouraged a large number of interested colleagues.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
[
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
Terence Tao's office is naturally no exception.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
]
Of course Terence Tao, who only speaks Cantonese and English, cannot understand Russian, but this does not hinder the genius of this genius.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
And, share your thoughts!
When he put the journal down, he couldn't help but let out a sigh of admiration.
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
Instead it’s like…
"Research on the overall existence of smooth solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equation under specific initial values"
According to what I know about him, his advantage is that he is good at using a variety of mathematical tools, and his involvement in different research fields is the broadest among the scholars I have seen. Not only that, his ability to understand and use mathematical tools is also rare among the scholars I have seen.
Professor Tao took a blank piece of draft paper from the table and picked up the pen again. With a serious look in his eyes, he carefully read the calculations line by line on the paper.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
Then, something even more awesome happened.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
Regarding the research on NS equations, he had not seen it in the Annual Mathematics for some time.
Previously, Lu Zhou suddenly changed his studies to materials science and chemistry. Many scholars in the field of mathematics expressed regret and believed that Lu Zhou should not disperse his energy to other fields at his best age, but should concentrate his energy as much as possible. , push the areas you are good at to a higher level.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
By setting a special initial value, he proved that the smooth solution corresponding to the initial value would lose regularity in a finite time. This is equivalent to finding a counterexample, skipping the proof process, and logically denying the correctness of this idea.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
[
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
Lu Zhou
Then, something even more awesome happened.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
If the idea itself is wrong, then there is no question of whether it is correct or not.
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
Time passed like this.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
Previously, Lu Zhou suddenly changed his studies to materials science and chemistry. Many scholars in the field of mathematics expressed regret and believed that Lu Zhou should not disperse his energy to other fields at his best age, but should concentrate his energy as much as possible. , push the areas you are good at to a higher level.
Instead it’s like…
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
This conclusion was recognized by many scholars in the field of partial differential equations at the time, and facts have proven that his speculation was correct.
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
Lu Zhou
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
He is good at choosing a brand new idea, injecting new content into an old method, or using it as nourishment to create an unprecedented mathematical method based on it.
However, it is not easy to review the manuscript for this scholar.
Professor Tao took a blank piece of draft paper from the table and picked up the pen again. With a serious look in his eyes, he carefully read the calculations line by line on the paper.
At this moment, the pen tip held in his hand suddenly paused slightly and stopped behind a page number.
Although Perelman, who solved Pang's conjecture, had a withdrawn personality, he at least wrote his paper in English. But Mr. Oterbayev seemed not to be good at English. He wrote in Russian, and the article was 90 pages long, which directly discouraged a large number of interested colleagues.
Not long after, Professor Gregory Selekin, a Russian mathematician at the University of Oxford, finally completed the review. He pointed out six errors when reviewing Oterbayev's paper, and finally ended the article. Thesis Controversy.
That is to update the blog.
Although Perelman, who solved Pang's conjecture, had a withdrawn personality, he at least wrote his paper in English. But Mr. Oterbayev seemed not to be good at English. He wrote in Russian, and the article was 90 pages long, which directly discouraged a large number of interested colleagues.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
Comment on hot events, comment on articles, and comment on colleagues in academia.
But now it seems that all the rumors are self-defeating.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Of course, Oterbayev himself, who realized his mistake, admitted it openly and openly in the end, but this is a story for another day.
Of course Terence Tao, who only speaks Cantonese and English, cannot understand Russian, but this does not hinder the genius of this genius.
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
That is to update the blog.
All in all, Professor Tao still has quite a say in the field of NS equations.
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
If the idea itself is wrong, then there is no question of whether it is correct or not.
After all, even though the NS equation is very widely used in application fields, it is too difficult for pure mathematics to make enough results on this proposition to be published in the "Annals of Mathematics"!
… I think this is a very interesting discovery. What is gratifying is not just the conclusion he got in the paper, but the very illuminating method he used in the argumentation process.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
Instead it’s like…
]
What particularly impressed him was that the mathematical methods Lu Zhou used in his argument were something he had never seen before.
And according to his habit of blogging, although he rarely puts serious academic content on his blog, the information he conveys through his blog has often been verified by himself.
Obviously, his work is more than outstanding.
Usually, if a scholar can apply a mathematical tool to the extreme and make innovations based on it, he is worthy of the word outstanding.
In fact, not only Terence Tao spoke highly of this paper, but many experts in the field of differential equations also gave neutral or above-neutral views.
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
Not long after, Professor Gregory Selekin, a Russian mathematician at the University of Oxford, finally completed the review. He pointed out six errors when reviewing Oterbayev's paper, and finally ended the article. Thesis Controversy.
Lu Zhou
That is to update the blog.
Let me evaluate, if he continues to improve this mathematical method, maybe he really has hope to finally solve this century's problem.
Regardless of whether he is studying the "existence and smoothness of solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", a century-old problem that has been rewarded by the Clay Institute, the mathematical methods he uses will bring great benefits to colleagues who study this proposition. Quite an inspiration.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
Just like Lu Zhou's passion for hair scarves, this boss also has a well-known hobby in addition to research.
Before I knew it, it went from early morning to noon.
Then, something even more awesome happened.
When he saw the author of the paper, he was slightly stunned, and his eyebrows even raised a hint of interest.
As soon as the new "Annual Review of Mathematics" was delivered to the office, he put down what he was doing, opened the catalog of the journal, and began to search for papers that he was interested in along the catalog. Then he marked next to the page number and prepared to wait until he was not busy. Focus on reading.
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.
Regardless of whether he is studying the "existence and smoothness of solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", a century-old problem that has been rewarded by the Clay Institute, the mathematical methods he uses will bring great benefits to colleagues who study this proposition. Quite an inspiration.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
Regardless of whether he is studying the "existence and smoothness of solutions to the three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations", a century-old problem that has been rewarded by the Clay Institute, the mathematical methods he uses will bring great benefits to colleagues who study this proposition. Quite an inspiration.
[
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
Previously, Lu Zhou suddenly changed his studies to materials science and chemistry. Many scholars in the field of mathematics expressed regret and believed that Lu Zhou should not disperse his energy to other fields at his best age, but should concentrate his energy as much as possible. , push the areas you are good at to a higher level.
For example, Professor Fefferman, chairman of the Department of Mathematics at Princeton University, basically coincides with Tao Zhexuan's views. He believes that the methods used by Lu Zhou in the argumentation process are more significant than the conclusions drawn in his paper itself.
Time passed like this.
According to Professor Oterbayev's paper, Terence Tao first followed his idea and constructed an equation with a similar structure to the NS equation, but with some differences. If the conclusion of the original proof is true, then there is no doubt that the example he constructed will also have a globally smooth solution.
Now that he was interested, he didn't want to go to the afternoon class. Professor Tao called his teaching assistant and turned on his laptop after dumping the responsibility for the class.
However, after Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou has been silent for more than a year and has not published a mathematical paper in the strict sense. As a result, many people doubted whether this genius was tired of mathematics.
Previously, Lu Zhou suddenly changed his studies to materials science and chemistry. Many scholars in the field of mathematics expressed regret and believed that Lu Zhou should not disperse his energy to other fields at his best age, but should concentrate his energy as much as possible. , push the areas you are good at to a higher level.
Although he only went through it roughly once, it did not prevent him from appreciating its connotations.
But now it seems that all the rumors are self-defeating.
Of course, if you want to understand the beauty of this paper more deeply, you have to spend more time reading it carefully.
"NS equation?"
This genius not only did not give up studying mathematics.
Previously, Lu Zhou suddenly changed his studies to materials science and chemistry. Many scholars in the field of mathematics expressed regret and believed that Lu Zhou should not disperse his energy to other fields at his best age, but should concentrate his energy as much as possible. , push the areas you are good at to a higher level.
But now it seems that all the rumors are self-defeating.
Instead it’s like…
Because this scholar is much more advanced than Professor Enoch, who claimed to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis the following year. He is considered a serious mathematician. He can complete the operation from preprint to journal submission in one go, so he has not been criticized. Ruthless cold shoulder.
By setting a special initial value, he proved that the smooth solution corresponding to the initial value would lose regularity in a finite time. This is equivalent to finding a counterexample, skipping the proof process, and logically denying the correctness of this idea.
In the next "big game"
That is to update the blog.
However, after Goldbach's conjecture, Lu Zhou has been silent for more than a year and has not published a mathematical paper in the strict sense. As a result, many people doubted whether this genius was tired of mathematics.
As one of the four top journals in mathematics, almost any mathematics-related laboratory or research institute will order "Annals of Mathematics".
He originally planned to read through the papers he was interested in when he had time, but when he saw this familiar name, he couldn't wait any longer.