If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
However, the Nobel Prize is not an ordinary honor after all, and it does not only need to consider issues in a certain aspect or field.
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
It is true that he has made outstanding results, but there are also many equally outstanding results that are still in the queue.
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
After all, China is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of top international talents is always one of the focuses of talent work.
After all, in the 21st century, it is really difficult to make such important results in the field of theoretical chemistry...
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
Unless, he is really good.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
Although Nobel's will did not stipulate how old the winner must be, not everyone is happy to break the rules and set a new record in history.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
Just last year, the "theoretical model of electrochemical interface structure" he established caused quite a stir in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and he won the honor of the Hoffmann Medal.
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences is located in a quiet corner of the institute building.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
After all, China is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of top international talents is always one of the focuses of talent work.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
It is true that he has made outstanding results, but there are also many equally outstanding results that are still in the queue.
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
In fact, Orlov himself was very hesitant as to whether what he insisted on was right or not.
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
"I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is indeed outstanding. Although I did not attend the lecture in Berlin, I communicated with many professors from the Max Planck Society afterward, and their opinions were indisputable. Exceptionally high... But I must say that this result is too young."
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
Just last year, the "theoretical model of electrochemical interface structure" he established caused quite a stir in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and he won the honor of the Hoffmann Medal.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
Olof Ramstrom is a professor of mechanical chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the jury for the 18th Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
Looking at his old friend, Peter sighed softly.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
And, it’s not just the application areas.
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Just last year, the "theoretical model of electrochemical interface structure" he established caused quite a stir in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and he won the honor of the Hoffmann Medal.
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
Just last year, the "theoretical model of electrochemical interface structure" he established caused quite a stir in the fields of computational chemistry, surface chemistry and even condensed matter physics, and he won the honor of the Hoffmann Medal.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
Now even cryo-electron microscopy has won awards. It is impossible to say that chemists have no opinions at all.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
However, the Nobel Prize is not an ordinary honor after all, and it does not only need to consider issues in a certain aspect or field.
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
In fact, Orlov himself was very hesitant as to whether what he insisted on was right or not.
It is true that he has made outstanding results, but there are also many equally outstanding results that are still in the queue.
Many people have not even been selected after waiting in line for decades, and some people have even been selected from the prime of life until they are about to be buried...
If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
Many people have not even been selected after waiting in line for decades, and some people have even been selected from the prime of life until they are about to be buried...
After all, China is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of top international talents is always one of the focuses of talent work.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
After all, China is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of top international talents is always one of the focuses of talent work.
After all, in the 21st century, it is really difficult to make such important results in the field of theoretical chemistry...
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
It is true that he has made outstanding results, but there are also many equally outstanding results that are still in the queue.
If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
Looking at his old friend, Peter sighed softly.
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
Unless, he is really good.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
If the problem of controllable nuclear fusion can really be solved, a research institute is really nothing, and even more exaggerated treatment can be considered.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
Unless, he is really good.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
But he just feels that work in the pure field of chemistry should be considered for this Nobel Prize.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
Looking at his old friend, Peter sighed softly.
Now even cryo-electron microscopy has won awards. It is impossible to say that chemists have no opinions at all.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
"Physics? The scope of your research is really broad." After looking at the paper in the hands of his colleagues, Professor Peter Brzezinski, who had also just attended the meeting, raised his eyebrows and said with interest.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
Although Nobel's will did not stipulate how old the winner must be, not everyone is happy to break the rules and set a new record in history.
However, the Nobel Prize is not an ordinary honor after all, and it does not only need to consider issues in a certain aspect or field.
Olof Ramstrom is a professor of mechanical chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the jury for the 18th Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
And, it’s not just the application areas.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
But this does not prevent him from combining it with the "Physics Review Letters" at hand and referring to the comments of professionals to understand what is so good about this paper, or which problem it has solved that has troubled the physics community for many years.
In contrast, organic synthesis methodology has only won 12 awards that are actually awarded to chemists. As for inorganic chemistry, it is even worse...
"I'm not studying physics, but this paper seems to have caused quite a stir in the physics community recently. I heard several professors discussing it, so I asked an acquaintance to help me get a copy and take a look."
Many people have not even been selected after waiting in line for decades, and some people have even been selected from the prime of life until they are about to be buried...
In fact, Orlov himself was very hesitant as to whether what he insisted on was right or not.
In contrast, organic synthesis methodology has only won 12 awards that are actually awarded to chemists. As for inorganic chemistry, it is even worse...
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
Now even cryo-electron microscopy has won awards. It is impossible to say that chemists have no opinions at all.
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
After all, in the 21st century, it is really difficult to make such important results in the field of theoretical chemistry...
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
Many people have not even been selected after waiting in line for decades, and some people have even been selected from the prime of life until they are about to be buried...
"I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is indeed outstanding. Although I did not attend the lecture in Berlin, I communicated with many professors from the Max Planck Society afterward, and their opinions were indisputable. Exceptionally high... But I must say that this result is too young."
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
Now even cryo-electron microscopy has won awards. It is impossible to say that chemists have no opinions at all.
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
Looking at his old friend, Peter sighed softly.
Now even cryo-electron microscopy has won awards. It is impossible to say that chemists have no opinions at all.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Olof Ramstrom is a professor of mechanical chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the jury for the 18th Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
"I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is indeed outstanding. Although I did not attend the lecture in Berlin, I communicated with many professors from the Max Planck Society afterward, and their opinions were indisputable. Exceptionally high... But I must say that this result is too young."
It is true that he has made outstanding results, but there are also many equally outstanding results that are still in the queue.
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
After all, in addition to the Chemistry Prize, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine is where biologists should go.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
"So that award was indeed controversial, and it surprised many people. But what we are going to say is actually not the point. The key to the problem is that he is too young." Professor Peter shook his head, "The 24-year-old nominee … If the Nobel Prize were awarded to him, there is no doubt that he would be the youngest recipient.”
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
"I can understand your mood. His work in the field of surface chemistry is indeed outstanding. Although I did not attend the lecture in Berlin, I communicated with many professors from the Max Planck Society afterward, and their opinions were indisputable. Exceptionally high... But I must say that this result is too young."
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
And, it’s not just the application areas.
There are great differences of opinion within the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury. Some people think that he and his research results are too young, but others think that youth is not a reason to ignore the importance of the results.
If DNA is regarded as a large molecule, then there is indeed nothing wrong with the Nobel Prize Committee's choice, and it can be logically justified.
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
Although Nobel's will did not stipulate how old the winner must be, not everyone is happy to break the rules and set a new record in history.
Olof Ramstrom is a professor of mechanical chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the jury for the 18th Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
For example, Professor Orlov is one of the supporters of the latter view.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
However, the Nobel Prize is not an ordinary honor after all, and it does not only need to consider issues in a certain aspect or field.
Unless, he is really good.
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
"The 2017 Chemistry Prize has been awarded to cryo-electron microscopy, and the 15-year award-winning research on DNA repair mechanisms is even something that Karolinska Institute should consider. To be honest, if we don't consider chemistry in the true sense, As a result, our Nobel Prize in Chemistry Review Committee can simply change its name to the Biology Prize Review Committee.”
Someone has made an interesting statistic. Among the five secondary disciplines of chemistry, the most Nobel Prizes are given to polymers and biochemistry, accounting for even one-third. Among them, biochemistry has won 26 Nobel Prizes for chemistry. The award was given to structural biology 6 times.
However, the Nobel Prize is not an ordinary honor after all, and it does not only need to consider issues in a certain aspect or field.
However, this subjective issue is quite difficult to judge, unless there happens to be a scholar in surface chemistry on the Nobel Prize committee who can better describe the work he has done from an objective perspective...
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
Prior to this, the youngest Nobel Prize winner was 25-year-old Lawrence Bragg.
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
"Don't be like this, my friend, biochemistry is also a part of chemistry... and cryo-electron microscopy cannot be completely regarded as an achievement in the field of biology. In fact, it can also be regarded as a study of methodology in analytical chemistry, right?"
But he just feels that work in the pure field of chemistry should be considered for this Nobel Prize.
Upon hearing this, Professor Peter, who is engaged in biochemistry research, coughed slightly in embarrassment.
In the past month, the name Lu Zhou had taken over almost half of the disputes raised by the Nobel Committee, so much so that they had held several meetings but could not reach a consensus on the issue of this name.
Orlov shook his head, "This word play makes no sense. We all know whether it changes biology or chemistry."
Peter Brzezinski, standing next to him, is a master in the field of biochemistry from Stockholm University. He is also an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences and a member of the evaluation committee of this Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Orloff asked rhetorically: "What does this have to do with it? When we award awards for 'Design and Synthesis of Molecular Machines,' are we considering the possible contributions of this technology in the future?"
In fact, Orlov himself was very hesitant as to whether what he insisted on was right or not.
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
Peter stared at the paper for a while and asked in an uncertain voice: "Lu Zhou?"
But he just feels that work in the pure field of chemistry should be considered for this Nobel Prize.
After all, China is a country that is good at adapting, and the introduction of top international talents is always one of the focuses of talent work.
In contrast, organic synthesis methodology has only won 12 awards that are actually awarded to chemists. As for inorganic chemistry, it is even worse...
Olof Ramstrom is a professor of mechanical chemistry at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden and an academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences. He is also a member of the jury for the 18th Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
As October gets closer and closer, it is not just the physics community that is having a headache because of the name Lu Zhou. The Nobel Prize Jury in Chemistry in Stockholm is also having a headache with this name.
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
Never mind the reaction of the domestic academic community.
After all, in the 21st century, it is really difficult to make such important results in the field of theoretical chemistry...
Or in other words, they should give an award to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structure.
Orlov definitely couldn't understand the mathematical formulas listed in the paper, after all, he was not in the right field.
In contrast, organic synthesis methodology has only won 12 awards that are actually awarded to chemists. As for inorganic chemistry, it is even worse...
In his opinion, modified PDMS materials and HCS-1 may still need to be considered. After all, although these two achievements have broad prospects for industrialization, they have not yet reached a prominent level in terms of their contribution to the field of chemistry. However, in his opinion, the theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure has undoubtedly reached an outstanding level.
However, everyone knows that this is unfair to chemists.
After all, in the 21st century, it is really difficult to make such important results in the field of theoretical chemistry...
In the past year, many scholars have made quite valuable results around the theoretical model he established.
What's more interesting is that the focus of those debates is not around the results of the selection itself. After all, whether it is the "shuttle effect" of lithium-sulfur batteries or the issue of lithium anode dendrites, they are all quite high-level research results.
Unfortunately, among these committee members, there are no scholars studying surface chemistry.
In contrast, organic synthesis methodology has only won 12 awards that are actually awarded to chemists. As for inorganic chemistry, it is even worse...
Olof Ramström, who had just finished an internal meeting of the Nobel Prize Committee in Chemistry, was sitting at his desk, looking at the paper in his hand.
“Yes, it’s this troublesome guy,” Orlov continued in a joking tone after a moment’s pause. “Maybe we’ll see him nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics next year.”
It is no exaggeration to say that the theoretical model he established has redefined the subject of surface chemistry and opened up new research ideas for computational chemistry.
In fact, Orlov himself was very hesitant as to whether what he insisted on was right or not.