In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
At this time, this city at the tip of the Baltic Sea will attract attention from all over the world because of its Nobel Prize list.
In addition, there are optogenetics, which has been developing rapidly recently, and motor proteins, etc.
When there is disagreement, there is no better way to resolve the issue than voting.
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
…
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
Olof asked rhetorically: "But apart from him, are there any other more outstanding achievements in the field of theoretical chemistry?"
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
Seeing that the other committee members had no objection, Academician Klass winked at the assistant next to him.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
At first glance, this big pit of biology seems quite attractive.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
Several people exchanged glances.
But looking back now, even if you search all over the world, it is difficult to find a more cost-effective investment than that 31 million kronor.
In addition, there are optogenetics, which has been developing rapidly recently, and motor proteins, etc.
And the atmosphere of debate is getting more and more intense...
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
Olof asked rhetorically: "But apart from him, are there any other more outstanding achievements in the field of theoretical chemistry?"
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
In 2015, it was at her initiative that the Nobel Prize was awarded to DNA repair.
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
“I have a feeling it will end up like this,” Academician Klaas smiled, folded his piece of paper and gently placed it in the middle of the table, “We rarely reach consensus on our opinions anyway, right? "
But looking back now, even if you search all over the world, it is difficult to find a more cost-effective investment than that 31 million kronor.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
It turns out that in the field of biology, chemists are indeed more likely to produce beautiful results.
In 2015, it was at her initiative that the Nobel Prize was awarded to DNA repair.
Logically speaking, the list of Nobel Prize winners should have been ready three days ago.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
Never before has a city been able to receive such an honor for one award. There has never been a Swede, not even a Swedish king or prime minister, who has left such a huge and inexhaustible legacy to his country or nation.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
Of course, there will definitely be troubles that come with it.
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Especially for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which has been guarding this testament for more than a century.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
As October 4th gets closer and closer, compared to the increasingly lively Stockholm, the atmosphere in this ivory tower becomes more and more tense.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
As October 4th gets closer and closer, compared to the increasingly lively Stockholm, the atmosphere in this ivory tower becomes more and more tense.
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
And the atmosphere of debate is getting more and more intense...
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
Logically speaking, the list of Nobel Prize winners should have been ready three days ago.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
But this time, the members of the chemistry prize review committee did not reach a consensus.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
For example, the most puzzling thing is lithium batteries. When predicting the Nobel Prize every year, everyone will mention the name of lithium battery guru Goodenough, the legendary "Mr. Good Enough", but it has been delayed for so long. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences seems to have forgotten his name.
John, who had been silent until now, suddenly interjected: "I think what Academician Orlov said makes sense, and the electrochemical interface structure is not only an achievement in the fields of electrochemistry and theoretical chemistry, it is also groundbreaking in the field of computational chemistry." contribution.”
Picking up the pen and writing a word on the paper, Ms. Linse raised her eyebrows and looked at Klas: "Are you ready?"
Seeing that the other committee members had no objection, Academician Klass winked at the assistant next to him.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
…
Especially for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which has been guarding this testament for more than a century.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
At the urging of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury convened again.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
But looking back now, even if you search all over the world, it is difficult to find a more cost-effective investment than that 31 million kronor.
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
The list of the Chemistry Prize Jury Committee has no personnel changes compared to the previous two years. The only change is that Ms. Snogerup Linse has stepped down from the chairmanship, and 15-year member Claes Gustav Claes Gustafasson was promoted to Chairman.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Objectively speaking, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry judges’ award-winning ideas are indeed very confusing. The cryo-electron microscope of 2017 is okay, but the molecular machine of 2016 is a completely new concept. Although the results are outstanding enough, it is still far from being practical. have no idea.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
After a preliminary exchange of opinions, the meeting continued with discussions on the final nominations.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
As for the other three academicians, they are Peter Brzezinski, professor of biochemistry at Stockholm University, Olof Ramstrom, professor of organic chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, and Professor Johan Aqvist, a giant in the fields of molecular biology and computational chemistry.
"Okay, gentlemen... and ladies, there is no point in continuing to argue. Let us use the most democratic, fair, and traditional way to make the final decision."
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
And the atmosphere of debate is getting more and more intense...
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Especially for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which has been guarding this testament for more than a century.
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
Of course, the premise is that if the Nobel Prize is the goal...
Of course, there will definitely be troubles that come with it.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
As October 4th gets closer and closer, compared to the increasingly lively Stockholm, the atmosphere in this ivory tower becomes more and more tense.
In fact, they should have made a decision a month ago.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
In fact, they should have made a decision a month ago.
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
"Okay, gentlemen... and ladies, there is no point in continuing to argue. Let us use the most democratic, fair, and traditional way to make the final decision."
And the atmosphere of debate is getting more and more intense...
When there is disagreement, there is no better way to resolve the issue than voting.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
At the urging of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury convened again.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
In 2015, it was at her initiative that the Nobel Prize was awarded to DNA repair.
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
But this time, the members of the chemistry prize review committee did not reach a consensus.
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
It will also be the last review meeting of the year...
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
As October 4th gets closer and closer, compared to the increasingly lively Stockholm, the atmosphere in this ivory tower becomes more and more tense.
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
…
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
Picking up the pen and writing a word on the paper, Ms. Linse raised her eyebrows and looked at Klas: "Are you ready?"
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
Objectively speaking, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry judges’ award-winning ideas are indeed very confusing. The cryo-electron microscope of 2017 is okay, but the molecular machine of 2016 is a completely new concept. Although the results are outstanding enough, it is still far from being practical. have no idea.
For example, the most puzzling thing is lithium batteries. When predicting the Nobel Prize every year, everyone will mention the name of lithium battery guru Goodenough, the legendary "Mr. Good Enough", but it has been delayed for so long. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences seems to have forgotten his name.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
For example, the most puzzling thing is lithium batteries. When predicting the Nobel Prize every year, everyone will mention the name of lithium battery guru Goodenough, the legendary "Mr. Good Enough", but it has been delayed for so long. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences seems to have forgotten his name.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
In fact, they should have made a decision a month ago.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
“I have a feeling it will end up like this,” Academician Klaas smiled, folded his piece of paper and gently placed it in the middle of the table, “We rarely reach consensus on our opinions anyway, right? "
Logically speaking, the list of Nobel Prize winners should have been ready three days ago.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
For example, the most puzzling thing is lithium batteries. When predicting the Nobel Prize every year, everyone will mention the name of lithium battery guru Goodenough, the legendary "Mr. Good Enough", but it has been delayed for so long. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences seems to have forgotten his name.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
Picking up the pen and writing a word on the paper, Ms. Linse raised her eyebrows and looked at Klas: "Are you ready?"
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
Several people exchanged glances.
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
In fact, they should have made a decision a month ago.
It turns out that in the field of biology, chemists are indeed more likely to produce beautiful results.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
In addition, there are optogenetics, which has been developing rapidly recently, and motor proteins, etc.
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
It turns out that in the field of biology, chemists are indeed more likely to produce beautiful results.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
At this time, this city at the tip of the Baltic Sea will attract attention from all over the world because of its Nobel Prize list.
Never before has a city been able to receive such an honor for one award. There has never been a Swede, not even a Swedish king or prime minister, who has left such a huge and inexhaustible legacy to his country or nation.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
At first glance, this big pit of biology seems quite attractive.
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
Of course, the premise is that if the Nobel Prize is the goal...
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
After a preliminary exchange of opinions, the meeting continued with discussions on the final nominations.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
At first glance, this big pit of biology seems quite attractive.
Seeing that the other committee members had no objection, Academician Klass winked at the assistant next to him.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
At this time, this city at the tip of the Baltic Sea will attract attention from all over the world because of its Nobel Prize list.
It turns out that in the field of biology, chemists are indeed more likely to produce beautiful results.
Never before has a city been able to receive such an honor for one award. There has never been a Swede, not even a Swedish king or prime minister, who has left such a huge and inexhaustible legacy to his country or nation.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
And the atmosphere of debate is getting more and more intense...
“I have a feeling it will end up like this,” Academician Klaas smiled, folded his piece of paper and gently placed it in the middle of the table, “We rarely reach consensus on our opinions anyway, right? "
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
In fact, they should have made a decision a month ago.
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
At this time, this city at the tip of the Baltic Sea will attract attention from all over the world because of its Nobel Prize list.
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
It turns out that in the field of biology, chemists are indeed more likely to produce beautiful results.
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
In addition, there are optogenetics, which has been developing rapidly recently, and motor proteins, etc.
Of course, there will definitely be troubles that come with it.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
Olof asked rhetorically: "But apart from him, are there any other more outstanding achievements in the field of theoretical chemistry?"
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
In addition to theoretical models of electrochemical interface structures, Professor Franz-Ulrich Hartl of the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry and Arthur Horridge, Professor of Genetics at Yale University, have also discussed intracellular protein folding. The study of its effects and impacts is also an award worthy of consideration.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
Several people exchanged glances.
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Especially for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which has been guarding this testament for more than a century.
Several people exchanged glances.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Never before has a city been able to receive such an honor for one award. There has never been a Swede, not even a Swedish king or prime minister, who has left such a huge and inexhaustible legacy to his country or nation.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
Peter complained: "Then give it to intracellular protein folding! Why do we have to think about theoretical chemistry?"
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
The list of the Chemistry Prize Jury Committee has no personnel changes compared to the previous two years. The only change is that Ms. Snogerup Linse has stepped down from the chairmanship, and 15-year member Claes Gustav Claes Gustafasson was promoted to Chairman.
Even the then president of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Hans Forscher, complained that the Nobel Prize should donate money directly to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences instead of letting them do the thankless awarding process, and refused to participate in research reviews. Details meeting.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
As for the other three academicians, they are Peter Brzezinski, professor of biochemistry at Stockholm University, Olof Ramstrom, professor of organic chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, and Professor Johan Aqvist, a giant in the fields of molecular biology and computational chemistry.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
In 2015, it was at her initiative that the Nobel Prize was awarded to DNA repair.
At the urging of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury convened again.
Chairman Professor Klaas nodded.
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Peter emphasized fiercely: "But he is only 24 years old! Even younger than Lawrence Bragg! Can't we wait until he has passed his 25th birthday before considering his name?"
"Okay, gentlemen... and ladies, there is no point in continuing to argue. Let us use the most democratic, fair, and traditional way to make the final decision."
But looking back now, even if you search all over the world, it is difficult to find a more cost-effective investment than that 31 million kronor.
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
Although there have been times in history when the Nobel Committee could not reach a consensus and the announcement was postponed to mid-October, there is no reason why this should happen in the selection of this Nobel Prize. .
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
What’s interesting is that “they” haven’t always been like this.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
The other three committee members looked at each other and nodded.
At first glance, this big pit of biology seems quite attractive.
John, who had been silent until now, suddenly interjected: "I think what Academician Orlov said makes sense, and the electrochemical interface structure is not only an achievement in the fields of electrochemistry and theoretical chemistry, it is also groundbreaking in the field of computational chemistry." contribution.”
For example, the most puzzling thing is lithium batteries. When predicting the Nobel Prize every year, everyone will mention the name of lithium battery guru Goodenough, the legendary "Mr. Good Enough", but it has been delayed for so long. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences seems to have forgotten his name.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
He studies computational chemistry, and no one sitting here knows better than him how excellent that theoretical model is.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
Fortunately, with the unremitting efforts of Nobel's most trusted assistant, Langner Solman, the then King of Sweden finally announced the validity of the will, ending the controversy surrounding the 31 million kronor.
After a preliminary exchange of opinions, the meeting continued with discussions on the final nominations.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
As October 4th gets closer and closer, compared to the increasingly lively Stockholm, the atmosphere in this ivory tower becomes more and more tense.
…
Although the award is a matter for academicians of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the vast majority of Stockholm citizens are proud of this moment.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Ms. Linser nodded: "I agree with Peter's point of view."
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
After a preliminary exchange of opinions, the meeting continued with discussions on the final nominations.
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
There seemed to be a "scuffle" at the conference table.
However, the biggest disagreement in the Nobel Prize selection is precisely here.
As for the other three academicians, they are Peter Brzezinski, professor of biochemistry at Stockholm University, Olof Ramstrom, professor of organic chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, and Professor Johan Aqvist, a giant in the fields of molecular biology and computational chemistry.
Now, as she did then, she believes the award should go to biochemistry.
Olof asked rhetorically: "Since we are not limited to the research direction, why do we have to be limited to the age of the winner? Nobel did not say in his will that his inheritance must be distributed to people in their fifties. Old man."
Looking at Orlov and Peter arguing with each other, the chairman of the committee, Academician Klas, who had not spoken much, pondered for a moment, clapped his hands, and interrupted the quarrel on the conference table.
When there is disagreement, there is no better way to resolve the issue than voting.
Never before has a city been able to receive such an honor for one award. There has never been a Swede, not even a Swedish king or prime minister, who has left such a huge and inexhaustible legacy to his country or nation.
Peter was stunned for a moment, frowned and thought for a moment, and then said in a hesitant tone: "Research on molecular dynamics? Professor Robert Carr of Princeton is also doing excellent work in this field."
"Okay, gentlemen... and ladies, there is no point in continuing to argue. Let us use the most democratic, fair, and traditional way to make the final decision."
Of course, there will definitely be troubles that come with it.
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
At the urging of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury convened again.
Several people exchanged glances.
Especially for the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which has been guarding this testament for more than a century.
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
Picking up the pen and writing a word on the paper, Ms. Linse raised her eyebrows and looked at Klas: "Are you ready?"
Several people exchanged glances.
"Okay, gentlemen... and ladies, there is no point in continuing to argue. Let us use the most democratic, fair, and traditional way to make the final decision."
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
“I have a feeling it will end up like this,” Academician Klaas smiled, folded his piece of paper and gently placed it in the middle of the table, “We rarely reach consensus on our opinions anyway, right? "
At first glance, this big pit of biology seems quite attractive.
This would be the last time they discussed the issue.
Olof asked rhetorically: "But apart from him, are there any other more outstanding achievements in the field of theoretical chemistry?"
But looking back now, even if you search all over the world, it is difficult to find a more cost-effective investment than that 31 million kronor.
Prior to this, these two great men had already won the Lasker Prize, which is the vane of the Nobel Prize. Almost 50% of the winners of this award eventually won the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Chemistry.
John, who had been silent until now, suddenly interjected: "I think what Academician Orlov said makes sense, and the electrochemical interface structure is not only an achievement in the fields of electrochemistry and theoretical chemistry, it is also groundbreaking in the field of computational chemistry." contribution.”
Of course, the premise is that if the Nobel Prize is the goal...
When there is disagreement, there is no better way to resolve the issue than voting.
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
In October, the streets of Stockholm are filled with a festive atmosphere.
Seeing that the other committee members had no objection, Academician Klass winked at the assistant next to him.
Logically speaking, the list of Nobel Prize winners should have been ready three days ago.
As for the other three academicians, they are Peter Brzezinski, professor of biochemistry at Stockholm University, Olof Ramstrom, professor of organic chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, and Professor Johan Aqvist, a giant in the fields of molecular biology and computational chemistry.
Reading the meaning in his eyes, the assistant came forward and placed an A4 paper on everyone's desk.
At the meeting, Ms. Linse, who was over fifty years old, glanced sharply around the colleagues present and spoke in a strong tone.
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Although there is no consensus, there is no opinion on what Academician Klaas said.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."
Picking up the pen and writing a word on the paper, Ms. Linse raised her eyebrows and looked at Klas: "Are you ready?"
"As Academician Linse said, we have to make a decision. This will be the last meeting. I hope that if you have any opinions, please don't keep them in your heart."
Orlov: "In this year, we should consider real chemical results no matter what. If Mr. Nobel knew that we had turned his favorite chemistry prize into a 'biology prize', I believe he would not be happy in heaven." Will be happy.”
"We are the only ones left. The Royal Academy of Sciences hopes that we will make a decision as soon as possible, at least before the 4th."
Facts have proved that from a historical perspective, the vast majority of people are short-sighted. In that era before the Internet, few people had the opportunity to see the world beyond the Baltic Sea.
Orlov shook his head: "I admit that his work is indeed excellent, but it is far from outstanding to the point of excellence."
“I have a feeling it will end up like this,” Academician Klaas smiled, folded his piece of paper and gently placed it in the middle of the table, “We rarely reach consensus on our opinions anyway, right? "
With the development of science, the boundaries between disciplines are becoming more and more blurred, but the distance between directions is getting farther and farther. It is still difficult for scholars outside the field to understand the research results in different directions, let alone make horizontal comparisons.
At the urging of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry jury convened again.
In that era when nationalism swept across Europe, many Swedes publicly complained or even criticized that a Swedish rich man or scholar (Nobel) had neither donated his inheritance to the country nor to the Scandinavians. Any winning priority will leave behind not benefits, but countless troubles.
There is no surprise. The focus of the controversy is still on the "theoretical model of the electrochemical interface structure."