During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
"only these?"
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
Especially for a respected scholar.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
For example, when Wiles originally proved Fermat's Last Theorem, he even added a "preface" in front of the abstract, describing Fermat's Last Theorem and his childhood in a long paragraph. Everyone just smiled knowingly when they saw it. .
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
Although he paid attention to Sir Attiyah's paper and the progress of the Riemann Hypothesis, he did not have time to pay attention to the report meeting of the Heidelberg Laureates Forum. In addition, the sudden call from the Nobel Prize made him completely Forgot about this.
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
However, the problems in Sir Attiyah's paper are very obvious, and one can see the problems without even having to have particularly advanced mathematical knowledge.
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
The editor-in-chief, Professor Peter Sarnak, wanted him to write a short review of no more than 500 words for Sir Attiyah's paper. Only then did Lu Zhou remember this news that had caused a sensation in the mathematics community not long ago.
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
Sir Attiyah certainly has the qualifications to be willful. After all, he is the winner of the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize. His research on the Attiyah-Singer Index Theorem is one of the most important mathematical achievements of the 20th century.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
However, the problems in Sir Attiyah's paper are very obvious, and one can see the problems without even having to have particularly advanced mathematical knowledge.
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
"Professor, I have printed the paper you want for you."
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
"only these?"
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
…
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
"only these?"
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
"only these?"
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
This is a very important concept in physics. It is usually used to measure the intensity of the interaction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields.
"Yes, Professor," Hardy nodded, "I'm sure that's all."
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
Being able to risk your own honor and have the courage to challenge Mount Everest is even more commendable.
In any case, it is quite difficult to still engage in research work when you are approaching 90 years old.
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
If it were to meet the requirements of a doctoral thesis, this paper would definitely not pass the test, but for the big names in academia, everyone is more tolerant.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
For example, when Wiles originally proved Fermat's Last Theorem, he even added a "preface" in front of the abstract, describing Fermat's Last Theorem and his childhood in a long paragraph. Everyone just smiled knowingly when they saw it. .
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
Sir Attiyah certainly has the qualifications to be willful. After all, he is the winner of the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize. His research on the Attiyah-Singer Index Theorem is one of the most important mathematical achievements of the 20th century.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
However these are not the point.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
Especially for a respected scholar.
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
Being able to risk your own honor and have the courage to challenge Mount Everest is even more commendable.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
But unfortunately, mathematics only pursues the truth and cannot and has never compromised with public opinion.
"only these?"
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
Unlike Mochizuki Shinichi's obscure and long and complicated paper, when no one knows whether he is right or not, anyone who understands is obliged to stand up and testify.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
…
If it were to meet the requirements of a doctoral thesis, this paper would definitely not pass the test, but for the big names in academia, everyone is more tolerant.
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
Anyway, Mr. Faltings is well-known in the mathematics community for being "mean" and not giving any face to anyone. Everyone will not find it strange after hearing this, let alone lose face.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
This is a very important concept in physics. It is usually used to measure the intensity of the interaction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields.
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
Sir Attiyah certainly has the qualifications to be willful. After all, he is the winner of the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize. His research on the Attiyah-Singer Index Theorem is one of the most important mathematical achievements of the 20th century.
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Even if he didn't say anything, everyone knew it.
Although it is a pity, now it seems that my initial hunch seemed to be right.
But unfortunately, mathematics only pursues the truth and cannot and has never compromised with public opinion.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
If it were to meet the requirements of a doctoral thesis, this paper would definitely not pass the test, but for the big names in academia, everyone is more tolerant.
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
…
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
In short, as he said before, as long as the old man is happy...
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
In any case, it is quite difficult to still engage in research work when you are approaching 90 years old.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
Although it is a pity, now it seems that my initial hunch seemed to be right.
But unfortunately, mathematics only pursues the truth and cannot and has never compromised with public opinion.
In any case, it is quite difficult to still engage in research work when you are approaching 90 years old.
Although it is a pity, now it seems that my initial hunch seemed to be right.
This is a very important concept in physics. It is usually used to measure the intensity of the interaction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields.
However, the problems in Sir Attiyah's paper are very obvious, and one can see the problems without even having to have particularly advanced mathematical knowledge.
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
The editor-in-chief, Professor Peter Sarnak, wanted him to write a short review of no more than 500 words for Sir Attiyah's paper. Only then did Lu Zhou remember this news that had caused a sensation in the mathematics community not long ago.
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
Especially for a respected scholar.
However these are not the point.
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
Hardy scratched the back of his head in embarrassment, "The field of my research is not the Riemann zeta function... To be honest, Sir Attiyah's paper is too profound, and it seems to use some terms from physics."
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
Being able to risk your own honor and have the courage to challenge Mount Everest is even more commendable.
Hardy scratched the back of his head in embarrassment, "The field of my research is not the Riemann zeta function... To be honest, Sir Attiyah's paper is too profound, and it seems to use some terms from physics."
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
However these are not the point.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
However these are not the point.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
For example, when Wiles originally proved Fermat's Last Theorem, he even added a "preface" in front of the abstract, describing Fermat's Last Theorem and his childhood in a long paragraph. Everyone just smiled knowingly when they saw it. .
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
Sir Attiyah certainly has the qualifications to be willful. After all, he is the winner of the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize. His research on the Attiyah-Singer Index Theorem is one of the most important mathematical achievements of the 20th century.
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
"Professor, I have printed the paper you want for you."
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
"Well," Lu Zhou nodded and continued, "This is an important dimensionless number in physics, the symbol α, commonly found in quantum electrodynamics."
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
The editor-in-chief, Professor Peter Sarnak, wanted him to write a short review of no more than 500 words for Sir Attiyah's paper. Only then did Lu Zhou remember this news that had caused a sensation in the mathematics community not long ago.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
This is a very important concept in physics. It is usually used to measure the intensity of the interaction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields.
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
"Well," Lu Zhou nodded and continued, "This is an important dimensionless number in physics, the symbol α, commonly found in quantum electrodynamics."
Especially for a respected scholar.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
But unfortunately, no one has succeeded so far, so most people have given up.
Anyway, Mr. Faltings is well-known in the mathematics community for being "mean" and not giving any face to anyone. Everyone will not find it strange after hearing this, let alone lose face.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
"Well," Lu Zhou nodded and continued, "This is an important dimensionless number in physics, the symbol α, commonly found in quantum electrodynamics."
In short, as he said before, as long as the old man is happy...
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
However these are not the point.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
"Professor, I have printed the paper you want for you."
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
Even if he didn't say anything, everyone knew it.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Anyway, Mr. Faltings is well-known in the mathematics community for being "mean" and not giving any face to anyone. Everyone will not find it strange after hearing this, let alone lose face.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
However, the further he looked down, the tighter his brows became.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
However these are not the point.
Although he paid attention to Sir Attiyah's paper and the progress of the Riemann Hypothesis, he did not have time to pay attention to the report meeting of the Heidelberg Laureates Forum. In addition, the sudden call from the Nobel Prize made him completely Forgot about this.
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
In short, as he said before, as long as the old man is happy...
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
Einstein also claimed many times in his later years that he had found a way to unify the field theory, and he was even calculating it until the moment before his death... Even then, everyone no longer believed in his calculations and just quietly Accompany him until the end.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
In the early morning, when I arrived at the office, Hardy came over with several pieces of A4 paper.
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
In any case, it is quite difficult to still engage in research work when you are approaching 90 years old.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
After taking Sir Attiyah's paper from Hardy's hand, Lu Zhou was stunned for a moment and glanced at Hardy suspiciously.
Lu Zhou: "Whether there is a problem with the weak analytic todd function itself remains to be discussed... Because there is too little information that can be retrieved about this function, and I have no way to judge. The biggest problem in his paper is still the introduction of physics Fine structure constants in science."
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
Being able to risk your own honor and have the courage to challenge Mount Everest is even more commendable.
However, the problems in Sir Attiyah's paper are very obvious, and one can see the problems without even having to have particularly advanced mathematical knowledge.
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
In short, as he said before, as long as the old man is happy...
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
"only these?"
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.
Sir Attiyah certainly has the qualifications to be willful. After all, he is the winner of the Fields Medal and the Abel Prize. His research on the Attiyah-Singer Index Theorem is one of the most important mathematical achievements of the 20th century.
…
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Seeing this, we can actually draw a conclusion.
In any case, it is quite difficult to still engage in research work when you are approaching 90 years old.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
"Professor, I have printed the paper you want for you."
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
Unlike Mochizuki Shinichi's obscure and long and complicated paper, when no one knows whether he is right or not, anyone who understands is obliged to stand up and testify.
Especially for a respected scholar.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
"Yes, Professor," Hardy nodded, "I'm sure that's all."
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
However, the problems in Sir Attiyah's paper are very obvious, and one can see the problems without even having to have particularly advanced mathematical knowledge.
Although he paid attention to Sir Attiyah's paper and the progress of the Riemann Hypothesis, he did not have time to pay attention to the report meeting of the Heidelberg Laureates Forum. In addition, the sudden call from the Nobel Prize made him completely Forgot about this.
Hardy: "...the fine structure constant?"
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
…
Especially for a respected scholar.
"only these?"
For example, when Wiles originally proved Fermat's Last Theorem, he even added a "preface" in front of the abstract, describing Fermat's Last Theorem and his childhood in a long paragraph. Everyone just smiled knowingly when they saw it. .
Even if he didn't say anything, everyone knew it.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
Although I hate to say it, most of the people who often do this kind of thing are people like Professor Enoch...
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
"That's not true," Lu Zhou shook his head, "Even if he is wrong, his courage is still worthy of praise."
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
But let’s leave this kind of bad-faith thing to Mr. Faltings.
The editor-in-chief, Professor Peter Sarnak, wanted him to write a short review of no more than 500 words for Sir Attiyah's paper. Only then did Lu Zhou remember this news that had caused a sensation in the mathematics community not long ago.
"Yes, Professor," Hardy nodded, "I'm sure that's all."
Anyway, Mr. Faltings is well-known in the mathematics community for being "mean" and not giving any face to anyone. Everyone will not find it strange after hearing this, let alone lose face.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
What is more interesting is that physicists have spent more than a century trying to derive the α value from a physical point of view, and then "make up" a mathematical formula for it.
Sure enough, such claims are often unreliable...
Hardy scratched the back of his head in embarrassment, "The field of my research is not the Riemann zeta function... To be honest, Sir Attiyah's paper is too profound, and it seems to use some terms from physics."
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
But for a 25-year-old to do such a thing...
This is a very important concept in physics. It is usually used to measure the intensity of the interaction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields.
To put it simply, Sir Attiyah introduced a weak analytic Todd function of his own creation in the proof, and used a hypothetical method to associate this Todd function with the fine structure constant in physics.
Because the invitation for the manuscript was sent by Professor Sarnak, and also out of respect for a highly respected scholar, Lu Zhou still sat down on the office chair without any subjective color. I started reading this five-page paper.
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
"Yes, Professor," Hardy nodded, "I'm sure that's all."
"only these?"
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
As Sir Attiyah previously claimed, he "solved" the problem with a very simple method.
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
Even if he didn't say anything, everyone knew it.
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
After writing this reply, Lu Zhou suddenly understood why it was such an important matter, but no one at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton tacitly discussed it.
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
Until recently, he suddenly received an invitation to write a paper in the "Annals of Mathematics".
Will the mathematical community blindly trust a person because of the glory or achievements he has achieved
Anyway, Mr. Faltings is well-known in the mathematics community for being "mean" and not giving any face to anyone. Everyone will not find it strange after hearing this, let alone lose face.
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
If it were to meet the requirements of a doctoral thesis, this paper would definitely not pass the test, but for the big names in academia, everyone is more tolerant.
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
After all, everyone will get old one day, and everyone also needs dignity and dignity...
The editor-in-chief, Professor Peter Sarnak, wanted him to write a short review of no more than 500 words for Sir Attiyah's paper. Only then did Lu Zhou remember this news that had caused a sensation in the mathematics community not long ago.
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
Yes, he actually used proof by contradiction.
Especially for a respected scholar.
The most outrageous thing is not that he did not describe in detail what the Todd function is and how it is related to the Riemann zeta function in the paper, but that he used proof by contradiction in the argument.
It's really quite inconsiderate of the elderly's feelings.
Although he paid attention to Sir Attiyah's paper and the progress of the Riemann Hypothesis, he did not have time to pay attention to the report meeting of the Heidelberg Laureates Forum. In addition, the sudden call from the Nobel Prize made him completely Forgot about this.
However, in Sir Attiyah's paper, he used this concept directly and used it as the basis for his own argument.
Hardy said regretfully: "... If you are right, then Sir Attiyah will not be safe in his later years."
Lu Zhou thought about the invitation to publish in the "Annals of Mathematics" for a while, and finally wrote a polite reply, saying he was very busy with research as an excuse to politely decline Professor Peter Sanak's invitation to publish.
"What's wrong with the weak analytic todd function?" Hardy couldn't help but ask.
After reading the paper from beginning to end, Lu Zhou already had a preliminary understanding of the proof idea of the entire paper.
In addition, although the media likes to exaggerate the facts with eye-catching things, they are also more willing to believe that Sir Attiyah, who is nearly 90 years old, is still young...
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
During this time, Lu Zhou has been busy with research on superconducting materials and the graduation of students.
Although it is a pity, now it seems that my initial hunch seemed to be right.
Because my theory cannot be contradictory, the Riemann Hypothesis must be right...
That is, if the Riemann Hypothesis is wrong, then "my theory" is contradictory.
Even if he didn't say anything, everyone knew it.
In academia, there is a fundamental difference between "honest mistakes" and "academic fraud."
But unfortunately, mathematics only pursues the truth and cannot and has never compromised with public opinion.
Lu Zhou: "Yes, Sir Attiyah used some terms in physics. I once heard Professor Witten, who is familiar with him, say that Sir Attiyah seems to have only entered the field of physics in recent years. And his physical intuition is really unflattering. As for this paper, to put it more simply, he constructed a weak analytic Todd function in the paper and combined this function with a physical concept."
"You are also majoring in number theory, don't you have any opinions of your own?"
After hearing this, Lu Zhou suddenly smiled and put the paper aside.
Seeing that the expression on Lu Zhou's face didn't seem right, Hardy asked from the side: "How do you feel about this paper, Professor?"
The paper is five pages in total and has only three citations. There are some minor typographical errors in Sections 3 and 4, but they are not major problems.