After the premiere ended, "Fast and Furious 5" became the focus of attention. In this outpost related to the trend of the opening battle, Universal Pictures successfully took the lead and gained the audience's attention. Affirmation, but also ushered in a piece of affirmation from the media.
"Variety" magazine overturned its previous prediction without any psychological obstacles. Chief film critic Stephen Holden praised the film in the film review and praised Renly by name alone, believing that Renly is the chemical reaction of the film. The key, which coincides with the "Seattle Post" sample survey.
Not only did it kick off the Fast & Furious 5 craze; it also unburdened all the focus on Renly. On behalf of "Variety" magazine, Stephen gave 88 points, which became a wonderful start for the comprehensive review of 43 media, and laid a solid foundation.
Us Weekly's film critic Scott-Tobias opened with a string of exclamations, "Jesus Christ, unbelievable!"
Then connected with a series of adjectives, "thrilling, exciting, funny, light, beautiful, and more importantly, beyond imagination. This work completely breaks the patterns and routines of the previous four series of films, presenting a crime and justice, The fascinating dark world of friendship and regulations intertwines, and presents a wonderful blockbuster scene - not special effects, but actual combat. It sets an excellent precedent for this summer's commercial film, and sets a good benchmark enough to make Amazing!"
Finally, it ends with a series of statements, "The success of the film is largely due to Renly Hall, this new face is more like the real core of the whole film: in the face of justice, can laws and rules be broken? ; In the face of emotion, should reason and morality be compromised; and, in the face of absolute force, are fists and brains the right answer
The charm of the character played by Hall hides a rich story and a strong courage. His debut has become the key to the rebirth of the whole movie! "
Because of Gavin-Hunter's relationship, "US Weekly" is considered by many to be a loyal supporter of Renly. This time, the film critic Scott also continued this trend, giving a high score of 90 points. This is the only 90 among professional film critics after the premiere of "Fast and Furious 5"; of course, it is also the first 90 among the five works in the series.
First "Variety", then "U.S. Weekly", "Fast and Furious 5" showed an absolutely strong attitude in the first batch of media comprehensive reviews, coupled with the enthusiastic pursuit of the premiere audience, for a time, The work's prosperousness, bathed in aura, is incredible for a commercial film, and even more incredible for a sequel to the much-maligned first four in the series.
In fact, "Fast and Furious 5" is not all surrounded by flowers and applause.
"Rolling Stone" magazine's Pete Travis said, "The plot twist in the movie is reminiscent of the games eleven-year-old boys play on the playground. The chaos and noise of the beginning and the end is like a joke. Aside from Hobbes, the characters seem to be trying to prove, 'I'm handsome, I'm strong, I'm strong', but in reality, they're just a bunch of feel-good criminals."
In the end, Pitt ended his sarcasm with a joke, "This movie will touch all the buttons on your body, including those high/climbing, of course, including those that you can't touch."
With only 63 points, it clearly shows the position of "Rolling Stone" magazine. This is the third time Pitt has criticized Renly's work after "Buried Alive" and "Crazy in Love". The veteran film critic, I don't know if he has a personal grudge with Renly, but it is certain that he is completely unfamiliar with Renly's work. In the midst of praise, cold water was poured unswervingly.
This time, "Rolling Stone" is not alone, "Entertainment Weekly" and "Empire" magazines are also on the same line.
"Empire" magazine gave it a 60, and it was still a bad review. Sean Levy wrote in the review, "Tough face, sharp eyes, strong muscles. This work looks like it is full of force. , works with zero IQ, every character is pretending, but they don't know what they are pretending. The only exception is Renly Hall, but after changing his position in the second half, he became another fool. The character builds are completely ruined. It's the dumbest, grandest, meanest, most boring thing you'll find on the big screen this summer."
Full firepower, this is the real firepower, almost sprayed the entire movie over and over again, but the interesting thing is that the sixty points given by Sean are his five works in the series. , the only passing score. From this point of view, it's not that bad.
The real disaster was created by "Entertainment Weekly". This entertainment magazine, which has been very popular in the past few months, has repeatedly been able to capture the breaking point and attract countless attention, and this time is no exception. Amid the acclaim of "Fast & Furious 5," Nanny Lisa Schwartz held the banner of disapproval high and criticized the film in all aspects.
"If you're wondering why such a disastrously bad movie lasted for two full hours, it's because it opened up the clichés and read every detail, every prop, every detail in it carefully and carefully. way, and then it was all put together. Renly Hall, by the way, looked like Adam Sandler with no brains."
Lisa even used the insulting word, "Adam Sandler."
As we all know, Adam is a typical representative who has no acting skills, no self-motivation, no ambition, no effort, and no attitude. He has always been very satisfied with his status as a comedian, and he is also very satisfied with his routine performance for ten years. Every year, I regularly shoot a batch of bad films that are scolded by film critics, but they are always reluctant to change. Completely comfortable with the status quo. In addition, Adam is also a representative of facial paralysis performances.
This shows Lisa's contempt and anger, and mercilessly nailed "Fast and Furious 5" to the pillar of shame, and of course, Renly. The final score is a masterpiece, showing Lisa's rejection to the fullest: thirty-eight points.
Yes, only thirty-eight points. This is the only failing score in the first batch of "Fast & Furious 5" reviews, and it dropped to thirty-eight in one breath, which deeply shows the disgust of "Entertainment Weekly", even the "Empire" "'s Sean also resigned.
If there are positive reviews, there will naturally be negative reviews; if there is opposition, there will naturally be support. This is an inevitable law. This is true for any movie, especially commercial movies.
Fortunately, among the forty-three professional media reviews of "Fast and Furious 5", only three gave negative reviews, with single digits; in addition, ten gave mixed reviews. ; In addition, there are 30 companies, a total of 30 companies, all of them have given praise, and they have vented their praises like a tide.
"The Hollywood Reporter," Eighty-Three Points, "Rampaging explosions, hot-bodied beauties, tumbling male hormones, and not to mention, the handsome, athletic, powerful, and astonishingly charismatic Renly Hall— He's probably the hottest federal agent on screen this summer, and it's an irresistible attraction for younger audiences. Couldn't ask for more for a popcorn action movie."
"Vanity Fair", 80 points, "You can think of the 'Fast and Furious' series as a car, you have made various upgrades, and the performance has improved, but before that, these upgrades still can't make people Satisfied, until now. The addition of Renly Hall has turned this car upside down, almost can't help it, and it is full of new vitality. Even if it still has many flaws, you have started to love it the car."
ranwen.la
"Los Angeles Times," Seventy-five points, "It's a bland movie, which is not surprising. Big muscles, dirty big guys, all kinds of racing cars, self-explanatory lines, and for granted. The emotional transformation of the movie, everything is so straightforward and easy to understand. A movie like 'Fast & Furious 5' is hard to hate, it accomplishes its purpose and uses every opportunity to ignite a sense of pleasure in the audience's mind. The only one Regret: Renly Hall didn't live up to expectations."
"New York Times", Eighty Points, "Is this the worst work in the series? No. Full of entertaining drag racing scenes, smooth narrative rhythm, simple and crude pleasure/sense creation, the movie brings the entertainment properties of popcorn into play. The ultimate, unrestrained imagination is amazing. From this point alone, the fifth part has surpassed any previous work in the series.
Is this the best entry in the series? Yes. Renly Hall's character gave the script more content and space, and the light-hearted performance took the commercial film out of the original rough and messy, and all the settings became reasonable. It is a pity that the script failed to be called Hall's performance, which also hindered the leap from 80 to 90. "
"Village Voice", seventy-five points, "Who would have thought that the series of works actually completed a leap from quantitative change to qualitative change. Putting Renly Hall on the opposite side of Vin Diesel and Paul Walker, with a Enemy 2, this is either a genius idea or a crazy idea, Justin-Lin successfully completed the genius shooting. The appearance of Hall successfully gave the film more passion and spark, and at the same time It also gave the film more story and meaning. The simplicity and rudeness of B-level movies have transformed into a carnival feast of adrenaline. Congratulations."
"USA Today," Seventy Points, "It's a stupid movie, there's no more to it, but it's more than enough, just what the summer season needs. Renly Hall really shines."
Praise, praise, still praise; amazing, amazing, still amazing!
In the case of not being optimistic, "Fast and Furious 5" handed over a high score of 73 in the media comprehensive evaluation, not only created the best series, but also officially declared war on "Thor" with an absolutely strong attitude: Now that one side has taken the lead, how will "Thor" fight