“This is only an initial distribution method. The main reason for adopting this distribution method is to maintain the distribution of interests in the traditional sense, which is of certain significance to economic stability.
In the future, the degree of industrial automation will gradually increase. Although it is unlikely that all labor positions will be eliminated, a significant reduction can still be achieved. In order to avoid being charged labor position subsidies, some companies will prefer highly automated equipment.
Therefore, two methods will be adopted in the mid-term. One is as mentioned above, obtaining off-duty subsidies based on the labor force used by the enterprise. This method is mainly targeted at the service industry.
Because in the foreseeable time, the service industry is the most difficult industry to realize automation, and workers will be required to participate in it no matter what, which means that there will be no significant reduction in labor positions.
Moreover, in the service industry, especially in the daily service industry, the main cost in the future will still come from labor costs. Using this model, the value of the service industry can be better measured.
The other is for industrial and agricultural enterprises with a higher degree of automation in the future. It can be levied according to the proportion of the enterprise's revenue, and labor positions can be combined into the calculation, thus ensuring that the compensation of the general public is collected.
As for the final measures to be taken, we are still unable to decide, but I think it is better to establish a national economic benefit distribution committee to uniformly distribute national economic benefits.
This organization should include government, business representatives, citizen representatives, etc., people who can represent all walks of life and roles in society, and formulate the distribution of interests in the future in a relatively short period of time based on the national economic development at that time.
This can be more representative, but since the interests of various classes may be difficult to reach agreement in a short time, a relatively complete mechanism must be in place to ensure that the distribution of interests is reasonable and consensus can be reached.
The most taboo thing about profit distribution is extremely damaging to the interests of one party. For example, in order to protect the interests of ordinary people, it greatly damages the interests of enterprises. This will put corporate operations into trouble and economic development will be in trouble.
Nor can we harm the interests of ordinary people just to protect the interests of enterprises. This will make the economy fall into a dead end as it develops. Not only will capital be involved, but it will also cause social problems. " Zhao Yi added.
In fact, no matter what method is used, it is necessary to ensure the fair distribution of social benefits, so the distribution method is not the focus, the focus is to form such a social consensus.
Only when such a social consensus is reached can social distribution methods be adjusted in a timely manner when new changes occur. An unchanging system is not a good system, because no system can guarantee that it will never become outdated.
Even the two types he mentioned above are just references and do not mean that the future will be like this. This is one of the reasons why he insists on implementing this plan in advance.
I just want to see whether this method is the best in the actual implementation process. Practice brings true knowledge. Only by constant adjustment in practice can a relatively accurate and balanced effect be achieved.
Even if benefits are distributed according to the above principles and methods, it is still necessary to determine what proportion of distribution is given to ensure both the interests of the people and the interests of the sustainable development of enterprises.
This situation is not decided by patting oneself on the head, and there may even be adjustments to taxation in the future. This forms a distribution of interests among the three parties, the government, enterprises and the people. The interests of these three parties need to be guaranteed to a certain extent.
The balance of the interests of the three parties is very important to the sustainable development of society. If the interests of any party are compressed, problems may arise over time.
The government's interests are the basis for ensuring social public services. If the government's fiscal revenue decreases, social public services will inevitably be affected. Even if the people get a lot of money, their lives may not be happy.
Of course, if the government distributes too many benefits, it will inevitably compress the interests of the other two parties, and the problems it brings will be equally serious. The actual income received by the people will decrease, and the actual profits obtained by enterprises will decrease.
The interests of enterprises are the basis for ensuring the sustainable development of social production. After all, the production organization of modern society is based on enterprises. If the interests of enterprises are damaged, it will inevitably lead to weak development of enterprises and social production will increasingly fall into a dead end.
Of course, there are also problems if the profits of enterprises are too high, which will lead to insufficient social consumption. Enterprises will find it increasingly difficult to make money, and the original profits will gradually disappear.
The most important thing is that due to the overdistribution of corporate interests, corporate capital surplus has increased significantly, while insufficient social consumption has led to corporate overproduction. Finally, in order to obtain benefits, a large amount of surplus capital has to have a serious competitive relationship. This is the internal capital The main cause of roll formation.
The final result is that no one wants to have a better life, but entrepreneurs are a minority after all. If there is a problem in society, these people may be the first to be targeted.
Don't feel wronged. There is no absolute justice in this society. The so-called justice means conforming to the public interests and meeting the requirements of social development, while unjust means obstructing the public interests. So there is no sense of injustice when capitalists are used to operate.
This is why as an entrepreneur or capitalist, he attaches great importance to the distribution of benefits to the whole society. Instead of being a miser, he feels that if he contributes the most, he will naturally distribute the most benefits.
This idea is correct to a certain extent, but it is not absolute. If one's own interests affect the balance of social interest distribution, then this is a sin.
It is precisely because of this and for the sake of long-term development that he pays so much attention to the distribution of interests, especially to his current level, the distribution of interests can even be said to be his core concern.
In fact, the requirements of most people are very simple, that is, to live a happy life, and a happy life mainly comes from two aspects. On the one hand, a higher degree of freedom in material life, and on the other hand, a relative abundance of spiritual life.
The former can be achieved through profit distribution. As long as everyone feels that they are not particularly short of money in life and can live a good life, although they cannot afford luxury brands, there are not many other difficulties.
The existence of luxury goods itself is to harvest the wealth of high-income people, and it has little to do with ordinary people. In previous lives, those who had the income of working-class people but always missed luxury brand bags shows that there is a serious problem in the brain. .
Spiritual wealth lies in a strong body and rich knowledge. He is also actively planning work in this area, such as a significant increase in college enrollment, the construction of urban sports venues, and so on.
It can be said that in the urbanization construction of China Housing Corporation, sports training venues, schools and hospitals are the largest public service facilities, with the highest proportion in the world.
Basically every community will have a small sports venue, and several communities will have many indoor sports venues. This is especially true for schools, which can basically meet the enrollment needs of children living in all surrounding communities.
This is in line with his philosophy that public service facilities of this kind would rather have a surplus than not have enough, because deciding on construction plans based on current needs cannot keep up with the needs of the times.
Therefore, when constructing public service facilities, they are calculated based on the maximum number of people that can live in the surrounding area to ensure that the needs of surrounding residents can be met in the future.
In fact, he was silently preparing for the future. As for whether the future would develop as he expected, that was not something he could decide.
Do your best, obey destiny, and do well where you can. This is enough. As for the future, it depends on how society develops. For example, Tianwen Bookstore builds libraries in every county-level administrative division or above. A truth.
Although the old man nodded after listening to what he said, it did not mean that he would finally approve his profit distribution methods. At most, he would just let him try it out for the time being.
However, it can be seen from his description that he has indeed given some thought to the distribution of interests, which makes him feel more at ease. He is afraid that if he just goes ahead without caring about it, serious problems will arise.
As for the first benefit distribution plan, it is the most conservative and the most consistent with the current social production relations. At least this kind of distribution will not cause too much confusion.
"Have you ever considered that if robots can replace most ordinary people's jobs, then a large number of people in the government will need to leave their jobs. Even if they don't leave their jobs, many people will join the enterprise." The old man asked road.
In fact, many positions in government jobs can be replaced by robots. It can even be said that more than 90% of the positions can be filled by robots.
If enterprise employees can get paid even if they leave their jobs, it will inevitably affect the operation of the government. When employees can get high salaries without working much, there will be a strong siphon effect.
At that time, people who are not in this system will be attracted by this system unconsciously, including the government and enterprises that are not in this system, will be affected.
It is human nature to prefer leisure and avoid work, and it can even be said to be the nature of all living things. It is the same as seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages. Although many government jobs are not very hard, it is not as good as being able to get paid at home.
What's more, the work at the grassroots level of the government is harder, and the salary is not very high. It is obvious that a large number of grassroots staff will be lost by then.
By then, even if the government does not want to use robots to replace these jobs, it will be impossible, otherwise it will mean that the government will not be able to provide public services to the people normally.
This will lead to great changes in the entire government operating system, and the government will need to constantly make adjustments to adapt to the new changes in society.
"There is no other way. We can only use robots to replace positions that robots are capable of. We cannot require all government personnel to do this job.
Of course, higher salaries can also be provided, but this will inevitably increase government expenditures and cause dissatisfaction among ordinary people in society, which is an approach that does more harm than good.
Moreover, when robots participate in grassroots work, they can prevent corruption, solve people's problems more patiently, and the results are more convincing to the people.
After all, when robots handle these things, they will only act according to the rules, without any selfish motives or interests. It is easier for the people to trust them.
In the government system, it is easier to identify the person responsible, because the things the robots perform must be based on official documents. If they are not official documents, they will not execute them.
This is different from humans. For the sake of their own interests, humans will still carry out verbal orders that do not meet the requirements even if their superiors give them. They will even take the blame if something goes wrong.
From this perspective, the participation of robots in more grassroots positions is conducive to government governance, and can also be regarded as building a protective fence between the government's power levels and the people.
Any orders and policies that endanger the interests of the people or violate the spirit of the central government's instructions will be stopped at the robot execution level and will not spread to the masses.
Moreover, this will also allow higher-level supervisory units and leaders to keep abreast of problems occurring at the grassroots level, which is of great benefit to the governance of the entire government.
Any government that wants to govern this country for a long time must gain the recognition and support of the people. Integrity and integrity in the process of governance are the most basic and a necessary condition for maintaining social fairness and justice.
If robots serve as the execution layer, as long as the central government's governance structure is in line with the interests of the people, then there will be no obvious nonsense when it is implemented below. " Zhao Yi said.
"Then these government employees who have been replaced by robots will be laid off?" the old man asked.
“I think this is a relatively safe approach, although it is indeed possible to add these replaced employees to the enterprise system, which can effectively reduce government administrative expenses.
But robots certainly have their advantages, but robots are still robots after all. If something goes wrong that day and cannot be remedied in time, humans need to be able to deal with it, otherwise serious social problems will arise.
Although I think this situation may be rare to see for a hundred years, once it does, it may be a big problem, because at that time, all aspects of society were inseparable from the robot system.
Therefore, we can let robots replace people at work, but we cannot allow humans to completely lose the ability to take over social work. This is very dangerous.
There is nothing wrong with human beings being indolent, seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages, but they absolutely cannot leave their destiny to robots. No matter how developed the society is, humans themselves are the last backing of society.
Therefore, many government jobs can indeed be replaced by robots, but the government must ensure that once the entire robot system stops functioning, the government can take over in a short time to ensure that the basic public services provided by the government are not affected.
This is why I do not recommend that the government levy high taxes on enterprises, and then the government uniformly distributes benefits to the people. In this way, the government can play a greater role and be more important.
But this kind of profit distribution isolates enterprises from the people. If no problems occur, everything will be fine. If problems occur, it will have a tsunami-like impact.
Think about it, all enterprises have stopped operating, there will be shortages of materials, and the services provided by enterprises cannot be used. This is simply a disaster for people who are accustomed to modernization.
If this disaster cannot be resolved in a short time, society will inevitably become uneasy. The originally orderly society will become disordered in an instant, and the consequences will be very serious.
Let alone one or two years, if society is shut down for even a week, chaos will occur, because at that time people's panic will cause many problems, and by then the government will not be able to manage effectively and businesses will not be able to recover. The consequences will be very scary to imagine.
That’s why I suggest adopting the method of off-duty subsidies so that off-duty workers will still be connected to social labor positions. In this way, if problems arise, at least the off-duty workers can perform their duties within a short period of time and provide basic social services.
As long as society stabilizes, it will be very easy to solve the problem. Even if the problem cannot be completely solved, there will still be enough time to restructure the system.
I can't make decisions about other companies. In the future, all employees who leave their jobs in my companies will need to spend at least two months every year participating in the company's work. They can choose the business management positions they are interested in to practice.
This can ensure that after leaving the company, they will still not be out of touch with the company's operations, and they will have an understanding of the company's operations. At that time, based on their practical level and position, they can directly step in in an emergency.
So I think the government can also adopt this approach in the future, and have to complete a certain number of hours of practical work with robots in a certain government position every year.
Only in this way can we get the full subsidy in the next year, otherwise the subsidy will be reduced according to the situation. This will also help prevent social degradation. " Zhao Yi said.
Although his ideal is that when everyone lives a prosperous life, they can focus on realizing their own ideals and making their own contributions to society, but this is only an ideal after all.
There will always be people who prefer to be salted fish, and the proportion may even be very large. To be honest, these people actually do not have much significance for the development of society. If they are not even willing to have children, then they are really useless.
In order to avoid this situation, there must be compulsory policies so that they have to participate in labor. Although their labor may not be meaningful in the face of robots, it can maintain a certain degree of social vitality.
At least at critical moments, these people can be pulled out to support. If they don't even have this effect, then they are really worth less than salted fish.
This is obviously contrary to his idea. If the result is too far from the ideal, then such a society is definitely unhealthy, and serious problems will inevitably occur at a certain point in the future.
As for the future management model of the government, what he said was only his vision. He could only make suggestions on how to do it specifically, but the decision-making power was not on his side. However, he hoped to form a new and effective political governance structure.
The large-scale use of robots is called a social change because it has such a huge impact, involving all aspects of politics, economy, culture, etc., and may even quietly change places that they cannot imagine now.
So after what he said, the old man said nothing more about his plan to carry out small-scale promotion in advance, because this was the safest way, and from what he said, relevant arrangements had been made, so he was not unprepared.
"Then how do you plan to carry out a small-scale pilot?" The old man thought for a while and asked.
Since it is a small-scale pilot, there must be choices. If all his companies are launched at once, it will not be a small-scale pilot, but a large-scale implementation.
Because his companies account for such a high proportion of the economy and provide the most jobs in the country, most of the domestic labor force is related to his companies.
Therefore, which industry or company is chosen as the initial pilot can also tell his thoughts, and the effects of the initial pilot in different industries are also different.
He has actually considered this issue. He feels that the most suitable industry at present is the apparel and textile manufacturing industry, and the companies involved are Hualong Apparel Company and Huansha Textile Company.
First, the technical difficulty of these manufacturing workers is not very high, and the industry itself has a certain level of automation, making them easier to replace.
Second, the number of employees in my country's textile and apparel industry is still relatively large, reaching about 15 million in total, of which more than 14 million jobs can be replaced in the initial stage.
The rest are either R&D positions, design positions, or service-oriented positions, which cannot be replaced for a while. Even if they can be replaced, the cost will be much higher than factory manufacturing replacement.
After all, the cost difference between a 10,000 yuan robot and a 100,000 yuan robot is 10 times. In terms of profitability, the gap between the two is not that big. Retaining these jobs is more beneficial to the company.
Moreover, this arrangement is more appropriate for Xuantian Technology Company. It will not cause a waste of production capacity because the demand is too small, nor will it cause financial pressure because the scale is too large in a short period of time.
"I plan to promote it in Hualong Clothing Company and Huansha Textile Company initially, replacing all manual labor positions, and see what the effect is. If the effect is satisfactory, I will further promote it in other enterprises."
"I think workers on construction sites have a much harder time than workers in factories. Why not start in the construction industry first?" the old man asked.
Hearing the old man's question, Zhao Yi immediately said: "This is due to two considerations. The first aspect is that the employment scale of this group is very large. If they are replaced in the early stage, it will put a lot of pressure on Xuantian Technology Company.
Moreover, these construction workers do not have a direct labor relationship with the China Housing Company, which is relatively complicated to deal with. However, in the clothing and textile industry, we have greater autonomy and can promote it more easily.
This is more conducive to us timely discovering problems that arise during the implementation process, summing up experience, and preparing for further promotion. However, promotion in third-party companies is not so convenient.
The second aspect is that most of the people currently engaged in the construction industry come from rural areas. If they are directly replaced, they will go directly back to the countryside, which is a bit detrimental to the current urbanization. The cities will not have enough population.
Moreover, their cultural level is currently not high. Although Chinese education companies have carried out relevant education and training, the time is still short and the effect is not that outstanding.
If these people get money for free, their ability to learn by themselves is weak, so Chinese education companies need to work harder to improve their cognitive level, which will also help them obtain higher incomes. "
Ultimately, he feels that workers who work in factories are generally more disciplined than those who work on construction sites. This is due to the characteristics of the industry they have been engaged in for a long time.
In order to avoid some problems, or to be on the safe side, the plan should be implemented in the factory first, which will be safer, reduce future twists and turns, and facilitate the implementation of the long-term promotion plan. (End of chapter)