What the hell is disapproval
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
Not only Luo Wenxuan but also Lu Zhou's students were surprised. Even Lu Zhou himself couldn't believe the content of this email.
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
However, the amount of information in it was so huge that almost no one could react.
"I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor Faltings... The things he has identified will basically not change, and..." After hesitating, Luo Wenxuan still reminded him, "... If you can't convince him, I'm afraid he will Constant sarcasm.”
After carefully reading Professor Faltings' review comments, Lu Zhou roughly understood what he meant.
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
[Lecture speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
Because he couldn't understand something as profound as analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan just stood behind Lu Zhou with a confused look on his face, pretending to understand, and quietly waited for Lu Zhou's results.
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
"If no one can convince anyone..."
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
"Proof that there's a problem?"
[This is too unusual anyway...]
"If no one can convince anyone..."
Almost on the day this news was released...
Because he couldn't understand something as profound as analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan just stood behind Lu Zhou with a confused look on his face, pretending to understand, and quietly waited for Lu Zhou's results.
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
"If no one can convince anyone..."
"Then it depends on which one of us can convince the others."
Not only Luo Wenxuan but also Lu Zhou's students were surprised. Even Lu Zhou himself couldn't believe the content of this email.
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
…
Almost on the day this news was released...
In this way, about ten minutes passed.
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
Just as the discussion continued to ferment, and just as people were discussing what further actions Lu Zhou or Faltings would take, Jinling University, which had always been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a piece of bombshell news on its official website.
Hearing these words, He Changwen, who was sitting next to him and listening with his ears pricked up, almost turned the pen spinning in his hand and flew away.
When he said this, he didn't feel confident at all.
"I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor Faltings... The things he has identified will basically not change, and..." After hesitating, Luo Wenxuan still reminded him, "... If you can't convince him, I'm afraid he will Constant sarcasm.”
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
OK.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
Luo Wenxuan asked, "What if none of you can convince anyone?"
It's just that this old gentleman is also famous for his eccentric temper, and his popularity in the academic world is not as good as that of Witten.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
Almost on the day this news was released...
"I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote."
Hearing these words, He Changwen, who was sitting next to him and listening with his ears pricked up, almost turned the pen spinning in his hand and flew away.
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
Thinking of this, He Changwen couldn't help but sigh in his heart.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
Especially when there is a group of gossip-loving creatures lying beside this wall.
However, the amount of information in it was so huge that almost no one could react.
Hearing these words, He Changwen, who was sitting next to him and listening with his ears pricked up, almost turned the pen spinning in his hand and flew away.
The boss is indeed a boss...
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued speaking as if nothing had happened.
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
Luo Wenxuan asked, "What if none of you can convince anyone?"
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
[…]
[This is too unusual anyway...]
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
[…]
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
When he said this, he didn't feel confident at all.
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
Almost on the day this news was released...
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
What's more, there is such a lack of gossip in the mathematics community that even trivial matters can arouse heated discussions throughout the academic world.
Because he couldn't understand something as profound as analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan just stood behind Lu Zhou with a confused look on his face, pretending to understand, and quietly waited for Lu Zhou's results.
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
Not to mention, Faltings and Lu Zhou, two great men at the level of bosses, the focus of the debate revolves around the nuclear-bomb-level problem of the Riemann Hypothesis...
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
It's just that this old gentleman is also famous for his eccentric temper, and his popularity in the academic world is not as good as that of Witten.
In this way, about ten minutes passed.
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
Lu Zhou shook his head.
"It's too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," Lu Zhou stood up from his chair, paused for a moment, and continued, "I will communicate this issue with Professor Faltings."
OK.
Seeing that Lu Zhou had finished reading, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
The entire mathematical community was suddenly in a state of excitement!
Not to mention, Faltings and Lu Zhou, two great men at the level of bosses, the focus of the debate revolves around the nuclear-bomb-level problem of the Riemann Hypothesis...
[…]
Seeing that Lu Zhou had finished reading, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
[…]
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
"It's too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," Lu Zhou stood up from his chair, paused for a moment, and continued, "I will communicate this issue with Professor Faltings."
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
"How is the result?"
[…]
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
OK.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
Lu Zhou shook his head.
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
Of course, this is also the charm of mathematics.
The boss is indeed a boss...
"I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote."
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
…
"How is the result?"
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
When he said this, he didn't feel confident at all.
Just as the discussion continued to ferment, and just as people were discussing what further actions Lu Zhou or Faltings would take, Jinling University, which had always been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a piece of bombshell news on its official website.
"How is the result?"
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
[This is too unusual anyway...]
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
Of course, this is also the charm of mathematics.
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
It's just that this old gentleman is also famous for his eccentric temper, and his popularity in the academic world is not as good as that of Witten.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
It's just that this old gentleman is also famous for his eccentric temper, and his popularity in the academic world is not as good as that of Witten.
"Proof that there's a problem?"
Not to mention, Faltings and Lu Zhou, two great men at the level of bosses, the focus of the debate revolves around the nuclear-bomb-level problem of the Riemann Hypothesis...
"I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote."
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
"It's too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," Lu Zhou stood up from his chair, paused for a moment, and continued, "I will communicate this issue with Professor Faltings."
Especially when there is a group of gossip-loving creatures lying beside this wall.
After carefully reading Professor Faltings' review comments, Lu Zhou roughly understood what he meant.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
The entire mathematical community was suddenly in a state of excitement!
"I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor Faltings... The things he has identified will basically not change, and..." After hesitating, Luo Wenxuan still reminded him, "... If you can't convince him, I'm afraid he will Constant sarcasm.”
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
"I'm afraid it's a little difficult to communicate with Professor Faltings... The things he has identified will basically not change, and..." After hesitating, Luo Wenxuan still reminded him, "... If you can't convince him, I'm afraid he will Constant sarcasm.”
After all, the deeper you delve into research in cutting-edge fields, the less obvious many things seem. Sometimes, it is possible that two different schools of thought have two different views on the same issue and have been arguing for a long time.
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
Because he couldn't understand something as profound as analytic number theory, Luo Wenxuan just stood behind Lu Zhou with a confused look on his face, pretending to understand, and quietly waited for Lu Zhou's results.
The boss is indeed a boss...
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
Luo Wenxuan asked, "What if none of you can convince anyone?"
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
"It's too early to discuss who is right and who is wrong," Lu Zhou stood up from his chair, paused for a moment, and continued, "I will communicate this issue with Professor Faltings."
After all, the deeper you delve into research in cutting-edge fields, the less obvious many things seem. Sometimes, it is possible that two different schools of thought have two different views on the same issue and have been arguing for a long time.
After discovering this incident, the editorial department of "Annals of Mathematics" immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also cooperated and deleted the leaked post. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known to more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
Of course, this is also the charm of mathematics.
The boss is indeed a boss...
In this way, about ten minutes passed.
Thinking of this, He Changwen couldn't help but sigh in his heart.
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
Of course, this is also the charm of mathematics.
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
What's more, there is such a lack of gossip in the mathematics community that even trivial matters can arouse heated discussions throughout the academic world.
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
However, the amount of information in it was so huge that almost no one could react.
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
What the hell is disapproval
"If no one can convince anyone..."
[Lecture speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]
…
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
The argument lasted for three full days, with neither party responding.
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued speaking as if nothing had happened.
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
"Then it depends on which one of us can convince the others."
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
When he said this, he didn't feel confident at all.
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
…
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
[It’s just that rejection of manuscripts is actually very common, right? Even top scholars will inevitably have some minor flaws in their papers.]
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
Luo Wenxuan asked, "What if none of you can convince anyone?"
Especially when there is a group of gossip-loving creatures lying beside this wall.
After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued speaking as if nothing had happened.
After all, the deeper you delve into research in cutting-edge fields, the less obvious many things seem. Sometimes, it is possible that two different schools of thought have two different views on the same issue and have been arguing for a long time.
After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued speaking as if nothing had happened.
Almost on the day this news was released...
"Proof that there's a problem?"
[This is too unusual anyway...]
On the night that Lu Zhou received the review comments from the "Annals of Mathematics", a big event happened on Mathoverflow.
Not only Luo Wenxuan but also Lu Zhou's students were surprised. Even Lu Zhou himself couldn't believe the content of this email.
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
Especially when there is a group of gossip-loving creatures lying beside this wall.
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
"I don't think there's anything wrong with what I wrote."
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
The argument lasted for three full days, with neither party responding.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
Almost on the day this news was released...
Almost on the day this news was released...
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
[Professor Lu’s manuscript was actually rejected? ! The sun is coming out in the west!]
"Proof that there's a problem?"
In this way, about ten minutes passed.
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
No matter how big the controversy, no controversy can last forever. The right side will always stand out from the crowd. Even though the three mathematical crises that broke out in history almost shook the foundation of the entire mathematical edifice, in the end people found a suitable way to resolve all disputes.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
[It’s just that rejection of manuscripts is actually very common, right? Even top scholars will inevitably have some minor flaws in their papers.]
[Lecture speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]
"Proof that there's a problem?"
[It’s just that rejection of manuscripts is actually very common, right? Even top scholars will inevitably have some minor flaws in their papers.]
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
Not only Luo Wenxuan but also Lu Zhou's students were surprised. Even Lu Zhou himself couldn't believe the content of this email.
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
Seeing that Lu Zhou had finished reading, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.
[This is too unusual anyway...]
Thinking of this, He Changwen couldn't help but sigh in his heart.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
Almost on the day this news was released...
It would be great if he could be so awesome...
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
Luo Wenxuan asked, "What if none of you can convince anyone?"
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
OK.
Lu Zhou shook his head.
[…]
Especially when there is a group of gossip-loving creatures lying beside this wall.
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
In terms of influence in the mathematics community, he is probably a little greater than his mentor Edward Witten.
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
…
After all, the deeper you delve into research in cutting-edge fields, the less obvious many things seem. Sometimes, it is possible that two different schools of thought have two different views on the same issue and have been arguing for a long time.
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
[This is too unusual anyway...]
This situation is also quite common in the world of mathematics. When two people have almost the same academic level, and their right to speak in the academic world is also very close, it is really difficult for anyone to convince the other on some specious issues.
OK.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
"If no one can convince anyone..."
After discovering this incident, the editorial department of "Annals of Mathematics" immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also cooperated and deleted the leaked post. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known to more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
What's more, there is such a lack of gossip in the mathematics community that even trivial matters can arouse heated discussions throughout the academic world.
"These are all secondary," Lu Zhou said nonchalantly, "If he is right, I will just correct it. If I am right, I will not change a single symbol."
On the night that Lu Zhou received the review comments from the "Annals of Mathematics", a big event happened on Mathoverflow.
[Nothing unusual, after all the reviewer is Faltins. This old guy is famous for being unkind, otherwise he would not have been able to survive at Princeton and went back to Germany to teach... This is so offensive, please allow me to remain anonymous.]
"Then it depends on which one of us can convince the others."
After discovering this incident, the editorial department of "Annals of Mathematics" immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also cooperated and deleted the leaked post. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known to more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
Not to mention, Faltings and Lu Zhou, two great men at the level of bosses, the focus of the debate revolves around the nuclear-bomb-level problem of the Riemann Hypothesis...
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
The boss is indeed a boss...
The argument lasted for three full days, with neither party responding.
Just when Luo Wenxuan was about to yawn, Lu Zhou suddenly closed the paper in his hand with a snap and threw the stack of papers on the table.
Hearing these words, He Changwen, who was sitting next to him and listening with his ears pricked up, almost turned the pen spinning in his hand and flew away.
…
What's more, there is such a lack of gossip in the mathematics community that even trivial matters can arouse heated discussions throughout the academic world.
When others receive a reply suggesting corrections, their first reaction is to just make the corrections honestly and that's it. When will the changes make the reviewers comfortable and when will the manuscript be approved? The boss will have to take a look at it before making any comments...
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
Seeing that Lu Zhou had finished reading, Luo Wenxuan asked curiously.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
What the hell is disapproval
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
He didn't notice what his students were thinking.
As soon as this news came out, it immediately ignited the topic in the entire forum. Almost as long as you open the forum, you can see people discussing this matter enthusiastically.
Just as the discussion continued to ferment, and just as people were discussing what further actions Lu Zhou or Faltings would take, Jinling University, which had always been outside the whirlpool of public opinion, suddenly released a piece of bombshell news on its official website.
After saying that, Lu Zhou bent down and dug out the printout of the paper that proved the Riemann Hypothesis from the cabinet under his desk. He compared the position pointed out by Professor Faltings with a line. Checked it line by line.
OK.
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
Luo Wenxuan hesitated for a moment and asked: "Then... could it be that Professor Faltings made a mistake?"
[This is too unusual anyway...]
However, the amount of information in it was so huge that almost no one could react.
After carefully reading Professor Faltings' review comments, Lu Zhou roughly understood what he meant.
[I have already said that his proof has serious flaws, and you are all criticizing me. Now look, I’m not the only one who thinks so, even Professor Faltings thinks so too, why don’t you guys go away? Idiots!]
When he said this, he didn't feel confident at all.
Lu Zhou shook his head.
On the night that Lu Zhou received the review comments from the "Annals of Mathematics", a big event happened on Mathoverflow.
The content of the message was very short, only about a hundred words.
Of course, this is also the charm of mathematics.
Hearing these words, He Changwen, who was sitting next to him and listening with his ears pricked up, almost turned the pen spinning in his hand and flew away.
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
In fact, strictly speaking, the review process of the reviewers should be strictly confidential, but somehow, some screenshots of the review comments were leaked by some boring person.
According to Professor Faltings, he believes that there are major disputes in some positions in the paper, resulting in serious proof flaws in the core part of the entire paper, which is not enough to prove that when ε is infinitely small, Re(s)≥1-ε There are no non-zero trivial points of the ζ function in the region.
After discovering this incident, the editorial department of "Annals of Mathematics" immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also cooperated and deleted the leaked post. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known to more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.
There is never an airtight wall in this world.
After discovering this incident, the editorial department of "Annals of Mathematics" immediately contacted the administrator of the Mathoverflow forum, and the administrator of the M forum also cooperated and deleted the leaked post. But the Internet is like this. Once a secret is known to more than two people, it cannot be called a secret.
After all, the deeper you delve into research in cutting-edge fields, the less obvious many things seem. Sometimes, it is possible that two different schools of thought have two different views on the same issue and have been arguing for a long time.
[Lecture speaker: Lu Zhou (Academician)]
However, the amount of information in it was so huge that almost no one could react.
To be honest, after Lu Zhou wrote this paper, this was the first time he was called back and asked for corrections.
One is a forum that only young scholars like this rarely go to. As for the other, although he has an account, he is probably the kind of person who doesn't bother to explain.
Almost on the day this news was released...
[This is not as simple as rejecting the manuscript. Didn’t you see that screenshot? The wording of the rejection was not as simple as having some minor flaws, but "major flaws in the core argument." Do you know what this means? Generally speaking, the appearance of this sentence means that if you cannot provide a satisfactory supplementary explanation for this, then the next time you will not be called back for rectification, but directly thrown into the wastebasket!]
The boss is indeed a boss...
[…]
[On December 18, our school will launch an academic report with the theme of "Proof of Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" in the auditorium of the old campus, and answer questions from scholars from all walks of life on-site on the questions that exist in the proof process. The registration channel is currently open. Those who are interested in participating should submit their registration information before the deadline of December 7.]
Lu Zhou shook his head: "It's too early to draw a conclusion now. Let me take a look before making any comments."
The entire mathematical community was suddenly in a state of excitement!
After carefully reading Professor Faltings' review comments, Lu Zhou roughly understood what he meant.
Someone suddenly broke the news that the paper Lu Zhou submitted to the "Annals of Mathematics" on the proof of the "Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis" was rejected by the reviewer, Professor Faltings.
That was Professor Faltings, the first person in mathematics after Grothendieck.
Standing behind Lu Zhou and reading the review comments from beginning to end, Luo Wenxuan swallowed and asked.
[It’s just that rejection of manuscripts is actually very common, right? Even top scholars will inevitably have some minor flaws in their papers.]
…
After a moment of pause, Lu Zhou continued speaking as if nothing had happened.